Pesticide metsulfuron-methyl (chemical name: methyl 2-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2- ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl)benzoate) is a post-emergence sulfonylurea herbicide which controls most annual grass broadleaf weeds in cereals, and it has been used for a long time.
The effect of metsulfuron-methyl on microbiological activity in soil was investigated. Trials were set up in laboratory on chernozem soil (pH 7.0, organic matter 3.5%, sand 26%, silt 45%, clay 29%) at Surcin, Serbia. Metsulfuron-methyl was added at rates 1, 5, 25 i 50 mg/kg soil. Untreated soil served as control. Samples were collected for analysis 5, 20, 40 and 60 days after metsulfuron-methyl application. The effects were assessed on dehydrogenase activity, bacteria abundance and fungi abundance.
Metsulfuron-methyl was found to cause different effects on the soil microbial activity in soil and its influence depended on the rate of application and duration of activity. Metsulfuron-methyl applied at 1 and 5 mg/kg soil did not have any effect on microbial parameters. The higher herbicide doses (25 and 50 mg/kg) induced increasing activity from the 5th to 40th day. These experimental data indicated that metsulfuron-methylon affected soil microbial activity, but the effects were only detected at higher doses and they were slight and transitory.
Bridge P, Spooner B. Soil fingi: diversity and detection. Plant and Soil. 2001;232:1–2, 147–54.
2.
Chauhan AK, Das A, Kharkwal H, Kharkwal AC, Varma A. Impact of microorganisms on environmental and helth. In: Microbes Health and Environment. 2006. p. 1–12.
3.
Sofo A, Scopa A, Dumontet S, Mazzatura A, Pasquale V. Toxic effects of four sulphonylureas herbicides on soil microbial biomass. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contamination, and Agricultural Wastes. 2012;47, 7:653–9.
4.
Zain NMM, Rosli BM, Kamaruzaman SM, M.M. Y, A. Effects of selected herbicides on soil microbial populations in oil palm plantation of Malaysia: A microcosm experiment. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2013;7, 5:367–74.
5.
Brown HM. Mode of action, crop selectivity and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pesticide Science. 1990;29, 2:263–81.
6.
Green JM, Uldrich JF. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Science. 1993;41, 5:508–16.
7.
Baghestani MA, Zand E, Soufizadeh S, Eskandari A, Azar RP, Veysi. M, et al. Efficacy evaluation of some herbicides to control weeds in maize (Zea mays L. Crop Protection. 2007;26, 8:936–42.
8.
Sikkema SR, Soltani N, Sikkema PH, Robinson DE. Response of sweet maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to halosulfuron. Crop Protection. 2008;27, 5:695-699,.
9.
Tomlin CDS. The Pesticide Manual. In: Sixteenth Ed, British Crop Protection Council. 2011.
10.
Dumontet S, Peruuci P, Scopa A, Riccardi A. Sulfonylureas: preliminary study on the effect on selected microbial strins and soil respiration. Soil Scince. 1993;1, 1:193–8.
11.
Perucci P, Scarponi L. Side effects of rimsulfuron on the microbial biomass of a clay-loam soil. Journal of Environmental Quality. 1996;25, 4:610–3.
12.
Ismail BS, Yapp KF, Omar O. Effects of metsulfuron-metil on amylaze, urease and proteaseactivities in two soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 1996;36, 3:449–56.
13.
Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes, In Method of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. 1982.
14.
Sabatini MA, Rebecchi L, Cappi A, Dinelli G, Vicari A, Bertolani R. Side effects of the herbicide triasulfuron on collembola under laboratory conditions. Chemosphere. 1998;37, 8:2963–73.
15.
Accinelli C, Screpanti C, Dinelli G, Vicari A. Short-time effects of pure and formulated herbicides on soil microbial activity and biomass. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2002;82, 8:519–27.
16.
Shaw LJ, Burns RG. Enzyme activity profiles and soil quality. In: Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. 2006. p. 15–171.
17.
Dinelli G, Vicari A, Accinelli C. Degradation and side effects of three sulfonylurea herbicides in soil. Journal of Environmental Quality. 1998;27, 3:1459–64.
18.
Radivojević L, S. G, Šantrić L, J. GU, D M. Short-time effects of herbicide nicosulfuron on the biochemical activiy on chernozem soil. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2012;77, 6:845–55.
19.
Wardle DA, Parkinson D. Relative importance of the effect of 2,4-D, glyphosate and environmental variables on the soil microbial biomass. Plant and Soil. 1991;134:209–19.
20.
Rath AK, Ramarkrishnan RB, Rath AK, Kusmaraswamy S, Bharati K, Singla P, et al. Effects of peticides on microbial biomass of flooded soil. Chemeshere. 1998;37, 5:661–7.
21.
Startton GW, Stewart KE. Glyphosate effects on microbial biomass in a coniferous forest soil. Environental Toxicology Water and Quality. 2002;7, 2:223–36.
22.
Radivojević L, Gašić S, Šantrić L, Stanković-Kalezić R. The impact of atrazine on several biochemical properties of chernozem soil. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2008;73, 10:951–9.
23.
Ahtianen JH, Vanhala P, Myllymaki A. Effects of different plant protection programs on soil microbes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2003;54, 1:56–64.
24.
Zabalou MC, Garland JL, Gomey MA. An integrated approach to evaluate the impact of the herbicides glyphosate, 2,4-D and metsulfuron-methyl on soil microbial communities in the Pampas region. Argentina, Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;40, 1:1–12.
25.
Ratcliff AW, Busse MD, Shestak CJ. Changes in microbial community structure following herbicide (glyphosate) additions to forest soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 2006;34, 2:114–24.
26.
Fate of a sulfonylurea herbicide in an alluvial soil, as shown by experimental degradation of pyrimidine-2- 14Clabeled rimsulfuron. Chemosphere. 1996;33, 8:625–33.
27.
Schneiders GE, Koeppe MK, Naidu MV, Horne P, Brown AM, Mucha CF. Fate of rimsulfuron in the environment. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1993;41, 7:2404–10.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
