×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

A METAHEURISTIC-DRIVEN INTELLIGENT MPPT AND MULTI-SOURCE DC–DC CONVERTER ARCHITECTURE FOR SIMULTANEOUS MAXIMUM POWER EXTRACTION IN HYBRID PV AND WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS

By
Haritha Inapagolla Orcid logo ,
Haritha Inapagolla
Contact Haritha Inapagolla

Research Scholar, Department of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India

R Ashok Bakkiyaraj Orcid logo ,
R Ashok Bakkiyaraj

Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India

Katragadda Swarnasri Orcid logo
Katragadda Swarnasri

Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, R.V.R.& J.C. College of Engineering, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Incorporation of renewable energy resources in contemporary electricity generation systems has led to major difficulties in attaining effective energy harnessing, constant voltage regulation, and efficient power management amid varying environments. Traditional Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) strategies, like the Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC), frequently encounter drawbacks such as slow convergence rates, steady-state oscillations, and poor tracking efficiency in PV and wind-based energy systems. In light of these issues, the present work suggests a new model known as the Hybrid Intelligent Power Management and Conversion System (HIPMCS). It uses the combination
of a multi-input DC-DC converter along with the intelligent Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-based MPPT control mechanism. This system ensures the simultaneous extraction of maximum energy from the PV and wind-based energy sources. The algorithm was tested and analyzed in MATLAB/Simulink considering various levels of solar insolation, wind speed, and loads. The performance evaluation of the system was done based on various parameters such as accuracy of the tracker, energy conversion efficiency, convergence time, and tracker error rate. It was found that the PSO-MPPT-based scheme resulted in an accuracy of 97.6%, energy conversion efficiency of 92.4%, convergence time of 0.46 seconds, and the least tracking error of 0.31%, which is superior compared to the conventional P&O, INC, GA-MPPT, and GWO-MPPT systems regarding system stability and dynamic response. Moreover, the suggested HIPMCS-based model improved the production of renewable energy by about 12% to 18%, while decreasing steady-state oscillations and improving voltage stabilization at DC buses.

References

1.
Abdel-Rahim O, Alghaythi ML, Alshammari MS, Osheba DSM. Enhancing Photovoltaic Conversion Efficiency With Model Predictive Control-Based Sensor-Reduced Maximum Power Point Tracking in Modified SEPIC Converters. IEEE Access. 2023;11:100769–80.
2.
Krishnan VR, Blaabjerg F, Sangwongwanich A, Natarajan R. Twisted Two-Step Arrangement for Maximum Power Extraction From a Partially Shaded PV Array. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2022;12(3):871–9.
3.
Cai X, Wai RJ. Intelligent DC Arc-Fault Detection of Solar PV Power Generation System via Optimized VMD-Based Signal Processing and PSO–SVM Classifier. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2022;12(4):1058–77.
4.
Thomas T, Mishra MK, Kumar C, Liserre M. Control of a PV-Wind Based DC Microgrid With Hybrid Energy Storage System Using Lyapunov Approach and Sliding Mode Control. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2024;60(2):3746–58.
5.
Ullah A, Ullah S, Hussan U, Alghamdi B, Pan J. Optimized Neuro-Adaptive Third-Order Sliding Mode Control With High-Gain Differentiator for Enhanced Photovoltaic System Performance: Simulation and Experimental Validation. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics. 2025;13(5):5970–89.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.