×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

LATENT URBAN HERITAGE ASSESSMENT IN SAIGON HO CHI MINH CITY THROUGH HISTORICAL CARTOGRAPHY AND URBAN MORPHOLOGY

By
Minh Hieu Nguyen Orcid logo ,
Minh Hieu Nguyen
Contact Minh Hieu Nguyen

Lecturer, Faculty of Industrial Fine Arts, Ton Duc Thang University, Tan Hung Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Ngoc Quynh Giao Pham Orcid logo ,
Ngoc Quynh Giao Pham

Lecturer, Faculty of Industrial Fine Arts, Ton Duc Thang University, Tan Hung Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Thi Minh Dieu Nguyen Orcid logo
Thi Minh Dieu Nguyen

Lecturer, Department of Land Management, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

Abstract

Ho Chi Minh City, historically known as Saigon, is being redeveloped at a pace that places pressure on heritage values located beyond protected monuments and colonial-era buildings. This study examines how earlier hydrological, settlement, commercial, defensive, administrative, and metropolitan structures remain visible or latent in the present urban fabric. It applies a qualitative historical-cartographic and urban-morphological design informed by the Historic Urban Landscape approach. Historical maps and plans, archaeological and historical scholarship, contemporary morphological research, heritage studies, and current planning documents were compared across three analytical periods: the pre-colonial riverine landscape, the Nguyen dynastic city of Gia Dinh, and the modern metropolitan period. Five attribute groups were coded by form, function, association, continuity state, evidence confidence, vulnerability, and planning relevance. The analysis identifies four modes of survival—persistence, adaptation, overwriting, and latency—and shows that two long-duration systems provide the strongest cross-period continuity. The hydrological-commercial system linked waterways, landing places, markets, production, mobility, and everyday life. The defensive-administrative system linked citadel geometry, strategic routes, institutional compounds, and later street organization. Their traces are uneven and often fall outside conventional building inventories. The study contributes an operational use of the urban-palimpsest concept by connecting historical evidence to specific planning responses. It recommends a georeferenced multilayer heritage atlas, hydrological heritage corridors, archaeological sensitivity zones, interpretation of verified citadel lines, ensemble-based adaptive reuse, graded development controls, and participatory monitoring. These measures provide a practical basis for integrating layered urban history into metropolitan planning without Treating the city as a fixed historical artifact.

References

1.
Nguyen TA, Le NMU, Nguyen DH, et al. Preserving cultural heritage and tourism promoting city values: Applying digitalization trends to cultural heritage. Science & Technology Development Journal - Engineering and Technology. 2022;
2.
Dang H, Pitts A. Urban Morphology and Outdoor Microclimate around the “Shophouse” Dwellings in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Buildings. 2020;10(3):40.
3.
Siravo F. Planning and Managing Historic Urban Landscapes. Reconnecting the City. Wiley; 2014. p. 161–202.
4.
Taylor K. The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation. Landscape Research. 2016;41(4):471–80.
5.
Ginzarly M, Houbart C, Teller J. The Historic Urban Landscape approach to urban management: a systematic review. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2018;25(10):999–1019.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.