ร—
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CAPITAL BUFFER ON RISK TAKING AND BANK PERFORMANCE IN VIETNAMESE COMMERCIAL BANKS

By
Tran Van Hai Orcid logo ,
Tran Van Hai

Lecturer, Faculty of Finance and Banking, Hanoi Open University, Hanoi, Vietnam

Tran Thi Lan Orcid logo ,
Tran Thi Lan

Lecturer, Faculty of Banking and Insurance, Academy of Finance, Hanoi, Vietnam

Nguyen Anh Nguyet Orcid logo
Nguyen Anh Nguyet
Contact Nguyen Anh Nguyet

Lecturer, Faculty of Banking and Insurance, Academy of Finance, Hanoi, Vietnam

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of capital buffers (CB) of 31 Vietnamese commercial banks over the period 2010-2024, taking into account the impact of income diversification ("DIV") under regulatory constraints (CARmin). In order to tackle endogeneity, unobservable heterogeneity, and panel persistence issues, a dynamic system GMM two-step procedure is applied. The post-estimation diagnostics involved Arellano-Bond's AR (2) test of serial correlation on second-order (p =0.724) and Hansen's test for exogeneity of the instruments (p = 0.461), revealing that the model was correctly specified and instruments were valid (18 instruments<31 groups). The results reveal that lagged capital buffer (CB๐‘–๐‘ก−1) is positively and significantly correlated with current buffers. This indicates dynamic capital adjustment behavior. Operating efficiency, proxied by the cost-to-income ratio (CIR), and bank size (SIZE) both exert statistically significant negative (๐‘ < 0.01 and ๐‘ < 0.05, respectively) on capital buffers, supporting cost-efficiency principles and the "too-big-to-fail" hypothesis. Notably, while direct effects of credit risk (NPL), credit growth, and liquidity (LIQ) are statistically insignificant (๐‘ > 0.10) due to strict  macroprudential regulatory constraints, the interaction variable (NPL × DIV) is positive and statistically significant (๐‘ < 0.05). The results from marginal effects analysis confirm that non-interest income diversification is a key buffer in eliminating the negative effect of credit risks on capital buffers with the increase in sources of income. These findings of the study give empirical proof that will assist bank managers and regulators to realize that non-interest income diversification coupled with cost management creates resilience and dynamic capital allocation in emerging economies.

References

1.
Abbas F, Butt S, Masood O, Javaria K. The Effect of Bank Capital Buffer on Bank Risk and Net Interest Margin: Evidence from the US. Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2019;5(2):72โ€“87.
2.
Beatty A, Liao S. Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2014;58(2โ€“3):339โ€“83.
3.
Berger AN, Bouwman CHS. How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of Financial Economics. 2013;109(1):146โ€“76.
4.
Berrospide JM, Edge RM. Bank capital buffers and lending, firm financing and spending: What can we learn from five years of stress test results? Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2024;57:101061.
5.
Bougatef K, Korbi F. Capital buffer and creditโ€risk adjustments in Islamic and conventional banks. Thunderbird International Business Review. 2018;61(5):669โ€“83.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.