The strategy for developing and improving the application of green, clean, renewable and gratis solar energy is a challenge for multidisciplinary teams of scientists. Exquisite examples of positive world practice of the largest solar power plants are presented in this paper, with all the characteristics, starting from the materials of photovoltaic panels and technical performance to the cost and financial benefits. The aim was to analyze the development of solar technologies in the function of defining further perspectives. The techno economic feasibility of the strategic orientation towards solar energy has been demonstrated in the model of the solar power plant, carried out by experiment, profitability calculation and multi-criteria analysis. The conclusion is that long-term financial and holistic benefits can be achieved by investing in solar power plants.
Parida B, Iniyan S, Goic R, A. Review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15(3):1625–36.
2.
Angus M. Development centre studies the world economy historical statistics: historical statistics. 2003.
3.
Pérez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Pout C. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and buildings. 2008;40(3):394–8.
4.
Barten H. 2005.
5.
Stevovic S. Sustainable water resources management of Prokletije region. Industrija. 2014;42(1).
6.
Neymark J, Judkoff R. Building Energy Simulation Test and Diagnostic Method for Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning Equipment Models (HVAC BESTEST. Vol. 2: Cases E300-E545. 2004.
7.
Morris SS, Woodworth WP, Hiatt SR. The value of networks in enterprise development: Case studies in Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2006;11(04):345–56.
8.
Chacra FA. Impact of energy storage costs on economical performance in a distribution substation. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on. 2005;20(2):684–91.
9.
Stevovic S, Miloradovic M, Stevovic I. Management of environmental quality and Kostolac mine areas natural resources usage. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2014;25(3):285–300.
10.
Harnmeijer J, Parsons M, Julian C. Community Renewables Economy. Starting up, scaling up and spinning out. 2013.
11.
Jäger-Waldau A. PV Status Report Research, Solar Cell Production and Market Implementation of Photovoltaics. 2008.
12.
Bosi M, Pelosi C. The potential of III-V semiconductors as terrestrial photovoltaic devices. Progress in Photovoltaics. 2007;15(1):51–68.
13.
Wadia C, Alivisatos AP, Kammen DM. Materials availability expands the opportunity for large-scale photovoltaics deployment. Environmental Science & Technology. 2009;43(6):2072–7.
14.
Prados MJ. Renewable energy policy and landscape management in Andalusia, Spain: The facts. Energy policy. 2010;38(11):6900–9.
15.
Jovanovic J. Energy-efficiency gain by combination of PV modules and Trombe wall in the low-energy building design. Energy and buildings. 2017;152(1):568–76.
16.
Li Y, Zou Y. Conjugated polymer photovoltaic materials with broad absorption band and high charge carrier mobility. Advanced Materials. 2008;20(15):2952–8.
17.
Nunzi JM. Organic photovoltaic materials and devices. Comptes Rendus Physique. 2002;3(4):523–42.
18.
Goetzberger A, Hebling C. Photovoltaic materials, past, present, future. Solar energy materials and solar cells. 2000;62(1):1–19.
19.
Lee MR. Solar power wires based on organic photovoltaic materials. Science. 2009;324(5924):232–5.
20.
Bovatsek J. Thin film removal mechanisms in ns-laser processing of photovoltaic materials. Thin Solid Films. 2010;518(10):2897–904.
21.
Stevovic I, Jovanovic J, Stevovic S. Sustainable management of Danube renewable resources in the region of Iron Gate: Djerdap 1, 2 and 3 case study. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2017;28(5):664–80.
22.
Turney D, Fthenakis V. Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15(6):3261–70.
23.
Nikolić V, Ivaniš M, Stevović I. Innovation Of Organization Model For Integral Rural Development-Serbia Case Study. Economics of Agriculture. 2014;61(3):695–706.
24.
Carmen Torres-Sibille A. Aesthetic impact assessment of solar power plants: An objective and a subjective approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2009;13(5):986–99.
25.
Stevovic I. Sustainability and profitability of solar energy application with case study. Ecologica. 2016;83(1):480–7.
26.
Stevovic I. Strategic management as a concept for sustainable development of solar program. Ecologica. 2017;88(1):797–801.
27.
Bartula. Local people’s attitudes towards quality of environment in Serbia – B&H cross border region. Archive for Technical Sciences. 2016;14(1):79–84.
28.
Crnogorac L et al. The electro filter ash of Gacko thermal power plant as technogenic raw material and the impact of ash waste pileon the environment. Arch for Technical Sciences. 2016;8(1):55–62.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
