Novi Sad and its surroundings are rich with the most diverse natural values that are good for the development of health tourism and recreation activities on their territory. Being in nature, next to water surfaces, forests and all green favorably affects on psycho – physical condition and improves life quality in urban environments. Aim of this work is geoecological evaluation of Novi Sad and its surroundings with the use of quantitative model of diversity, ie Hans Kiemstedt model for the purpose of health tourism and recreation. With this work authors want to contribute to further affirmation of geoecological evaluation in the area of planning and managing of urban areas. Methodology is based on Kiemstedt model, and criteria that are used are: forest and water edges, relief energy, way of land use and climate factor, or conditions of natural environment. Use of this model gives less of more favorable surfaces for the development of mentioned activities. The advantage of this model is the use of modern GIS technologies, obtaining tested and objective data that have a wide use.
Просторни план Града Новог Сада. „Сл. лист Града Новог Сад“ 11 2012.
2.
Упоредни преглед броја становника 1948. Vol. 2002. 1953. p. 2011.
3.
Pecelj M, Vagić N, Pecelj M, Đurić D. Geoekological evaluation of Belgrade and environment for the purposes of rest and recreation. Archives for Tehnical Sciences, year. 2016;VIII(14):63–72.
4.
Pecelj M, Lukić M, Pecelj M, Đurić D. Application of the Menex model in bioclimatic analaysis of Novi Sad and environment for the purposes of tourism and recreation. Archives for Tehnical Sciences. 2017;(16):77–84.
5.
Pecelj M, Lukić M, Peljec M. Bioklimatska evaluacija Novog Sada i okoline za potrebe turizma, odmora i rekreacije primenom modela Meneks. Zbornik radova „Planska i normativna zaštita prostora i životne sredine“. In: prostornih planera Srbije, Univerzitet u Beogradu – Geografski fakultet. 2017. p. 507–13.
6.
Pecelj M, Vagić N, Pecelj M, Pecelj J, Đurić D. Primena bioklimatskog modela MENEKS_05 u vrednovanju Beograda i okoline za potrebe odmora i rekreacije. Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja – U susret evropskim integracijama. In: prostornih planera Srbije, Univerzitet u Beogradu – Geografski fakultet. 2016. p. 389–96.
7.
Pecelj M, R.M. P, Mandić D, Pecelj J, Milinčić M, Tošić D. Informatioal Technology in Bioclimate Analysis of Banja Luka for Tourism and Recreation. In: in the book of 9th WSEAS International Conference on Telecomunication and Informatics, Included in ISI/SCI Web of Science and Web of Knowledge, ISBN: 978-954-9260-2-1, ISSN: 1790-5117. 2010. p. 35–9.
8.
Геоекологија. In: Београд: Универзитет у Београду – Географски факултет. 2015. p. 5–295.
9.
Pecelj J, Pecelj M, Pecelj M. Mogućnost primene geoekologije u prostornom planiranju. Zbornik radova Planska i normativna zaštita prostora i životne sredine. In: Asocijacijа prostornih planera Srbije, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet. 2011. p. 401–6.
10.
Kiemstedt H. Zur Bewertung der Landschaft für die Erholung. 1967.
11.
Kiemstedt H. Erfahrungen und Tendenzen in der Landschaftsbewertung. In: Forschungs und Sitzungsberichte der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. 1972. p.
12.
KIiemstedt H. Zur Bewertung natürlicher Landschaftselemente für die Planung von Erholungsgebieten. In: Technische Hochschule Hannover, Fakultät für Gartenbau und Landeskultur, Dissertation S. 1967. p. 149.
13.
Agency EE. Corine Land Cover 2012. 2012.
14.
Hoffmann G. Tourismus in Luftkurorten Nordrhein - Westfalens. Bewertung und perspektiven, Disertation. 1999;1–220.
Kiemstedt H. Möglichkeiten zur bestimmung der erholungseigung in unterschiedlichen Landschaftsraumen. Natur und landschaft. 1967;42(11):243–8.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
