×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Review paper

THE SIGNIF ICANCE OF HARVEST RESIDUES IN THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF ARABLE LAND. II. HARVEST RESIDUES MANAGEMENT

By
Novo Pržulj ,
Novo Pržulj
Contact Novo Pržulj

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vesna Tunguz ,
Vesna Tunguz

Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo , East Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Zoran Jovović ,
Zoran Jovović

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Podgorica , Podgorica , Montenegro

Ana Velimirović
Ana Velimirović

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Podgorica , Podgorica , Montenegro

Abstract

Harvest residues (HR) are one of the important aspects of sustainable management in agriculture, representing a significant portion of organic matter (OM) that can be retained or removed from agroecosystems. There are several ways to manage plant residues: (i) burning, (ii) incorporation in soil, (iii) leaving plant residues after harvest on the soil surface in form of mulch, (iv) undersowing crops in HR and (v) baling and removing HR from the plot. Burning is the most unreasonable action in agricultural production, which is prohibited by legal regulations in force. The burning means a complete loss of OM – N and S are irretrievably lost in the air, mineral substances remain in ash, and microorganisms in the soil surface layer are destroyed. Incorporation of HR may be complete or partial, depending on the soil cultivation method applied. This HR management method has a number of soil benefits: increases content of nutrients, OM and humus; increases microbiological activity; improves soil water, air and physical properties; improves soil structure, ultimately contributing to the increase in soil fertility and plant growth. Two practical approaches that were once common, have been neglected. Namely, undersowing and mixed cultivation where various species are simultaneously grown with or between plantings of a main crop. Removal of HR indirectly leads to a decrease of the organic matter in the soil. In essence, there is a need to determine the size of acceptors and the return rates of organic residues of different quality, and to increase the efficiency of nutrient cycling from residues through various land acceptors and crops, with minimal losses from the system.

References

1.
Singh BP, Rengel Z. The Role of Crop Residues in Improving Soil Fertility. In: Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems Soil Biology. 2007. p. 183 214.
2.
Vukadinović V, Vukadinović V. Zemljišni resursi – vrednovanje poljoprivrednih zemljišnih resursa, e-knjiga. 2018;197.
3.
Kastori R, I M. Ishrana biljaka. In: Vojvođanska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Novi Sad. 2008. p. 237.
4.
Manojlović M. Primena đubriva u organskoj poljoprivredi. U: Manojlović М (ur) Đubrenje u održivoj poljoprivredi. 2008;168 186.
5.
Pržulj N. Prinos strnih žita – sinteza, akumulacija i distribucija organske materije. In: Akademija nauka I umjetnosti Republike Srpske Grafomark, Banja Luka. 2016. p. 425.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

2

Crossref Logo

Lydia Mhoro, Akida Ignas Meya, Nyambilila Abdallah Amuri, Patrick Alois Ndakidemi, Kelvin Marck Mtei, Karoli Nicholas Njau

(2024)

Farming systems and soil fertility management practices in smallholdings on the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania

Frontiers in Agronomy, 6()

10.3389/fagro.2024.1282940

Crossref Logo

M.a. Bruno, S. Muraleedaran

(2025)

Assessing Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Strategies Using Molecular Ecology Tools in Coastal Ecosystems

Natural and Engineering Sciences, 10(2)

10.28978/nesciences.1714408

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.