This study explores the growing phenomenon of cybercrime targeting older adult individuals in Malaysia, a demographic increasingly susceptible due to factors such as limited digital literacy, social isolation, and perceived financial stability. Drawing upon Routine Activity Theory and Social Engineering Theory, the research investigates the situational and psychological vulnerabilities that expose senior citizens to scams, particularly phishing, identity theft, and impersonation-based fraud. Utilizing a phenomenological qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with 13 Malaysian seniors aged 60 and above to examine their personal experiences, awareness levels, and emotional responses related to cybercrime victimization. Findings revealed that while only a minority had been direct victims, the emotional toll—including trauma, shame, and anxiety—was significant across the board. Scam tactics often involved impersonation of authority figures and manipulation through urgency or emotional grooming. The study emphasizes the dual impact of cybercrime: financial losses and long-term psychological distress. It concludes that current institutional measures, though important, must be supplemented by age-targeted education, simplified security tools, and psychosocial support to effectively mitigate risks. This research provides critical insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and digital educators in building inclusive and safer online environments for Malaysia’s aging population.
References
1.
Mohamad ARB, Yaakop MR, Razif MABM. The Efficacy of the Malaysian Government’s Response towards Cybercrime. Open Journal of Political Science. 2024;14(01):166–76.
2.
Masoumeh H, Jahangiri S, Ali DrBH, Alireza K. A Survey on Existing Digital Divide between Teachers and Students of Girl Schools in Astara County. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2013;3(11).
3.
Bernama. Number of cybercrime cases reported in Malaysia from 2021 to June 2022 total of 31. 2022;
4.
Kassim N. Effect of perceived security and perceived privacy towards trust and the influence on internet banking usage among Malaysians. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;(2):26–36.
5.
Buil-Gil D, Miró-Llinares F, Moneva A, Kemp S, Díaz-Castaño N. Cybercrime and shifts in opportunities during COVID-19: a preliminary analysis in the UK. European Societies. 2020;23(sup1):S47–59.
6.
Amiri M, Akkasi A. Assessing security challenges in online social networks. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2015;(4):1–1.
7.
Button M, Shepherd D, Hawkins C, Tapley J. Fear and phoning: Telephones, fraud, and older adults in the UK. International Review of Victimology. 2024;31(1):117–34.
8.
Peydayeshi Y, Karimi M. Studying the relationship between emerging communication factors and religious beliefs. Int Acad J Innov Res. 2017;(2):22–9.
9.
Chen W, Guo X, Chen Z, Zheng Z, Lu Y. Phishing scam detection on Ethereum: Towards financial security for blockchain ecosystem. InIjcai. 2020;4456–62.
10.
Thasleena KF, Santhi P. Generational Divide in Digital Banking: Comparing Experience and Expectation across Generations X, Y, and Z. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2025;15(2):268–74.
11.
Cohen LE, Felson M. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review. 1979;44(4):588.
12.
Blazic BJ, Cigoj P, Blažič AJ. Web-Service Security and The Digital Skills of Users: An Exploratory Study of Countries in Europe. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security. 2023;13(3):41–57.
13.
Creswell J, Poth C. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2016;
14.
Malaysia C. Incident statistics 2024 Malaysia [Internet]. CyberSecurity Malaysia. 2024;87–3238.
15.
Ebner NC, Ellis DM, Lin T, Rocha HA, Yang H, Dommaraju S, et al. Uncovering Susceptibility Risk to Online Deception in Aging. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2018;75(3):522–33.
16.
An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of internet miscreants. Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. ACM; 2007. p. 375–88.
17.
Ismail A. Love Scam sasar mangsa kesunyian. 2023;
18.
James BD, Boyle PA, Bennett DA. Correlates of Susceptibility to Scams in Older Adults Without Dementia. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 2014;26(2):107–22.
19.
Abdul Rani MI, Zolkaflil S, Syed Mustapha Nazri SNF. The Trends and Challenges of Money Mule Investigation by Malaysian Enforcement Agency. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship (IJBT). 2024;13(1):37–50.
20.
A total of 51,631 online fraud cases were reported in Malaysia between 2019 and 2021 involving a total loss of RM1.61 billion. New Straits Times. 2022;
21.
Zulkipli N, Rashid N, Zolkeplay A, Buja A. Synthesizing cybersecurity issues and challenges for the elderly. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021;(5):1775–82.
22.
Public Service Delivery and Local Government. The older adult/senior citizens.
23.
Rahman R. Cybercrime cases in a decade: The Malaysian experience. 2019;
24.
Steele J, Reyes A, Brittson R, Shea O, K. Cyber crime investigations: Bridging the gaps between security professionals, law enforcement, and prosecutors. 2011;
25.
Sasse S. “Motivation” and Routine Activities Theory. Deviant Behavior. 2005;26(6):547–70.
26.
Wahid SDM, Buja AG, Jono MNHH, Aziz AA. Assessing the influential factors of cybersecurity awareness in Malaysia during the pandemic outbreak: a structural equation modeling. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021;8(74):73–81.
27.
Seniors a prime target for scams. 2024;
28.
Star T. Senior citizens lose over RM227,000 in credit card, investment scams in Pahang. 2023;
29.
The S, Daily. Safeguarding senior citizens from scams. 2023;
30.
Edge T, Malaysia. Malaysia lost over RM1.22b to cybercrime from January to October 2024 -PM. 2024;
31.
$1.4 trillion lost to scams globally; S’pore victims lost the most on average: Study. The Straits Times. 2024;
32.
Tripathi K, Cooper C. Cybercrime against older people during COVID19 pandemic. 2020;(4).
33.
Weissberger GH, Mosqueda L, Nguyen AL, Samek A, Boyle PA, Nguyen CP, et al. Physical and mental health correlates of perceived financial exploitation in older adults: Preliminary findings from the Finance, Cognition, and Health in Elders Study (FINCHES). Aging & Mental Health. 2019;24(5):740–6.
34.
Whitty MT, Buchanan T. The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012;15(3):181–3.
35.
Whitty MT. The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam. British Journal of Criminology. 2013;53(4):665–84.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.