This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the seismic performance of a G+5 reinforced concrete spaceframe subjected to pushover analysis. The analysis incorporates the critical influence of soil-structure interaction on varying slope inclinations. A nonlinear static pushover method is utilized to examine the lateral loading strength and deformation response of the spaceframe under various slope scenarios. Instead of the usual spring-type models, a more complex Monkey Tail model is used to describe the behaviour of the soil. This model incorporates the inherent nonlinearities and hysteretic properties of soil subjected to seismic excitation. These sample results are carefully contrasted with a fixed-base analysis to quantify the actual effect of soil-structure interaction on the response of the spaceframe. Thus, the objective of this study is to clarify this issue by investigating the effects of slope variations on capacity curve, key failure mechanisms and displacement demands on the structure. Engineers can benefit greatly from the knowledge gained from this study when building spaceframes in seismically active areas with sloping terrain. Engineers can improve structural safety and performance assessments by using the Monkey Tail model to reflect soil-structure interaction more realistically.
V A, SS K. Seismic Soil-structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review. InStructures. 2018;Nov 1 Vol. 16:317–26.
2.
Danková Z, Štyriaková I, Kovaničová Ľ, Čechovská K, Košuth M, Šuba J, et al. Chemical Leaching of Contaminated Soil-Case Study. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2021;June;1(24):65–72.
3.
Chopra AK, Gutierrez JA. Earthquake Analysis of Multistory Buildings, Including Foundation Interaction. University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. 1973.
4.
Abioghlia H. Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil Walls with Finite Element Method. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2016;3(3):70–6.
5.
Islam M, Pastariya S. Analysis of building on Sloping Ground subjected to Seismic Forces. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. 2020;7(1):141–6.
6.
Rahman S, Begum A. Applied Mechanics for Mechanical Engineers: Principles and Applications. Association Journal of Interdisciplinary Technics in Engineering Mechanics. March 29;2(1):13–8.
7.
Al-Hasnawi A, Abdul-Rahaim LA, Gheni HM, Fadel ZE. IoT Structure based Supervisor and Enquired the Greenhouse Parameters. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security. 2024;2024;14(1):138–52.
8.
Tahghighi H, Mohammadi A. Numerical Evaluation of Soil–Structure Interaction Effects on the Seismic Performance and Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2020;June 1;20:(6):04020072.
9.
Rahman S, Begum A. Analysis of Structural Integrity in High-Rise Buildings Under Dynamic Load Conditions Using AI: A Computational Perspective. Association Journal of Interdisciplinary Technics in Engineering Mechanics. Jun28;2(2):6–9.
10.
Veletsos AS, Younan A. Dynamic soil pressures on rigid vertical walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1994;Mar;23(3):275–301.
11.
Al-Jashaami SH, Almudhafar SM, Almayahi BA. The Impact of Climatic Characteristics on Increasing Soil Salinity in Manathira District Center. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2024;9(2):426–40.
12.
Wolf JP. Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics. 1997;Sep;26(9):931–49.
13.
Hua ZL. Elucidating the Role of Cytochrome p450 Enzymes in Drug Metabolism and Interactions. Clinical Journal for Medicine, Health and Pharmacy. Sep30;2(3):1–0.
14.
Naidu S, Kannan R. Numerical Optimization of Shoring Towers for Slab Formwork Systems. Int J for Trends in Eng & Tech. 2015;5(1):114–20.
15.
Gopalan SH, Dharshini SP, Shahanas A, Sountharya S. Internet Data Traffic Analysis Using TRAP GL-VQ Algorithm. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology. Mar31;8(1):37–44.
16.
Kumar A, Pushplata. Approach to formulate setback regulations for Indian hill towns. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2015;June 1;4(1):91–9.
17.
Assegid W, Ketema G. Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems and Environmental Frontiers. 2023;Nov 30;1(1):6–10.
18.
Wolf JP, Deeks AJ. Foundation vibration analysis: A strength of materials approach. Elsevier; 2004 Mar 4.
19.
Vasquez E, Mendoza R. Membrane-Based Separation Methods for Effective Contaminant Removal in Wastewater and Water Systems. Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation. 2024 Dec 27:21–7.
20.
Jahromi SG, Karkhaneh S. The plurality effect of topographical irregularities on site seismic response. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2019;Jul;18(3):521–34.
21.
Tehrani MH, Khoshnoudian F. Extended consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating seismic responses of one-way asymmetric plan tall buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2014;Sep; 13(3):487–507.
22.
Behnamfar F, Babaei AH, Ghandil M. Smoothed response spectra including soil-structure interaction effects. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2020;Jan;19(1):37–51.
23.
Kannan MR, Santhi MH. Constructability Assessment of Climbing Formwork Systems Using Building Information Modeling. Procedia Engineering. 2013;Jan 1;64:1129–38.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
