Water efficiency in agriculture is a crucial measure of how effectively farmers use their most vital resource. In practical terms, it reveals how much applied water actually nourishes crops versus being lost to evaporation or runoff. In the Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh, India, where water is incredibly scarce, making every drop count is crucial. Farmers here struggle to grow enough crops with the little water they have. To tackle this problem, researchers used a method called Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate how well Water User Associations along the Rohini Canal System were managing irrigation, looking at different parts of the smaller canals. DEA, a mathematical tool that doesn't rely on pre-set assumptions, compares the efficiency of different groups by looking at what they put in (like money spent) and what they get out (like the number of people helped, the area of land irrigated, and the number of crops produced). By comparing each group's actual performance to what's theoretically possible, DEA pinpoints where they can improve and sets standards for the best way to operate. The findings of the study done in this area revealed considerable. These results really highlight how important it is that we focus on improving how we manage our water resources and boost farm output overall. We need to do this to tackle these inequalities head-on. Plus, pinpointing which Water User Associations (WUAs) are doing a great job at using water efficiently gives us incredibly useful information. These successful WUAs can serve as role models, showing others how to adopt better irrigation methods. This way, we can all work together towards more sustainable farming in the area.
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science. 1984;30(9):1078–92.
2.
Panchal BY, Shah A, Shah P, Bhatt P, Tiwari M, Yadav A. Exploring Synergies, Differences, and Impacts of Agile and DevOps on Software Development Efficiency. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2024;14(3):175–85.
3.
Bassi N, Rishi P, Choudhury N. Institutional organizers and collective action: the case of water users’ associations in Gujarat, India. Water International. 2010;Feb 3;35(1):18–33.
4.
Nandy M, Dubey A. Effective Surveillance of Water Quality in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems through the Application of Intelligent Biosensors. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2024;Sep 1;9(2):234–43.
5.
Borgia C, García-Bolaños M, Li T, Gómez-Macpherson H, Comas J, Connor D, et al. Benchmarking for performance assessment of small and large irrigation schemes along the Senegal Valley in Mauritania. Agricultural Water Management. 2013;Apr 1;121:19–26.
6.
Viticchié A, Basile C, Valenza F, Lioy A. On the impossibility of effectively using likely-invariants for software attestation purposes. J Wirel Mob Networks Ubiquitous Comput Dependable Appl. 2018;9(2):1–25.
7.
Chun N. The Challenge of Collective Action for Irrigation Management in India. Asian Economic Papers. 2014;Jun 1;13(2):88–111.
8.
Vasquez E, Mendoza R. Membrane-Based Separation Methods for Effective Contaminant Removal in Wastewater and Water Systems. Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation. Dec 27:21–7.
9.
Gulati A, Meinzen-Dick R, Raju KV. From Top down to bottoms Up: institutional reforms in Indian canal irrigation. 1999;
10.
Lei C, Ibrahim M. Efficient Revenue Management: Classification Model for Hotel Booking Cancellation Prediction. Global Perspectives in Management. Mar 29;2(1):12–21.
11.
Huang Q, Wang J, Easter KW, Rozelle S. Empirical assessment of water management institutions in northern China. Agricultural Water Management. 2010;Dec 15;98(2):361–9.
12.
HN AJ, Kayabaş A. Students Real Data Features Analyzing with Supervised Learning Algorithms to Predict Efficiency. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology. Apr 30;14(1):34–45.
13.
Malano H, Hungspreug S, Plantey J, Bos MG, Vlotman WF, Molden D, et al. Benchmarking of irrigation and drainage projects. Report of the ICID Task Force. 2004;(4).
14.
Meinzen-Dick R, Raju KV, Gulati A. What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India. World Development. 2002;Apr 1;30(4):649–66.
15.
Saidova K, Madraimov A, Kodirova M, Madraimov A, Kodirova K, Babarakhimov T, et al. Assessing the impact of invasive species on native aquatic ecosystems and developing management strategies. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies. 2024;4(S1):45–51.
16.
Mukherji A, Blanka F, Tushaar S, Suhardiman D, Giordano M, Weligamage P. Irrigation reform in Asia: A review of 108 cases of irrigation management transfer. :1–131.
17.
Suljić N, Kovčić O. ANALYSIS OF TIME OSCILLATIONS OF WATER ON LAKE MODRIC AS A MULTI-PURPOSE RESERVOIR. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2018;Jan 1(18):31–40.
18.
Narain V. Brackets and black boxes: research on water users’ associations. Water Policy. 2004;Jun 1;6(3):185–96.
19.
Talatianazad S, Malekzadeh M. Evaluation of performance in Cloud Computing with Queue Theory. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2015;2(2):109–20.
20.
Ostrom E. Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. 1992;1–111.
21.
Ostsrom E. Incentives, rules of the game and development. Washington, DC: World Bank. 1995;May 1:207–316.
22.
Sitaram Phadnis S, Kulshrestha M. Evaluation of irrigation efficiencies for water users’ associations in a major irrigation project in India by DEA. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2012;Apr 6;19(2):193–218.
23.
Phadnis SS, Kulshrestha M. BENCHMARKING FOR WATER USERS ASSOCIATIONS TO ENHANCE PERFORMANCE OF THE SAMRAT ASHOK SAGAR MAJOR IRRIGATION SCHEME. Irrigation and Drainage. 2011;Oct;61(4):449–63.
24.
Rodríguez-Díaz JA, Camacho-Poyato E, López-Luque R, Pérez-Urrestarazu L. Benchmarking and multivariate data analysis techniques for improving the efficiency of irrigation districts: An application in spain. Agricultural Systems. 2008;Mar 1;96(1–3):250–9.
25.
Reddy VR, Reddy PP. How participatory is participatory irrigation management? Water users’ associations in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and political Weekly. 2005;Dec 31:5587–95.
26.
Sugden F, Agarwal B, Leder S, Saikia P, Raut M, Kumar A, et al. Experiments in farmers’ collectives in Eastern India and Nepal: Process, benefits, and challenges. Journal of Agrarian Change. 2020;Jan;21(1):90–121.
27.
Takayama T, Matsuda H, Nakatani T. . The determinants of collective action in irrigation management systems: Evidence from rural communities in Japan. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;Jul 30;206:113–23.
28.
Wang Y, Wu J. An Empirical Examination on the Role of Water User Associations for Irrigation Management in Rural China. Water Resources Research. 2018;Dec;54(12):9791–811.
29.
Zema DA, Nicotra A, Mateos L, Zimbone SM. Improvement of the irrigation performance in Water Users Associations integrating data envelopment analysis and multi-regression models. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;Jun 30;205:38–49.
30.
Zhang L, Heerink N, Dries L, Shi X. . Water users associations and irrigation water productivity in northern China. Ecological Economics. 2013;Nov 1;95:128–36.
31.
Bardhan P. Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2000;Jul;48(4):847–65.
32.
Bastakoti RC, Shivakoti GP. Rules and collective action: an institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in Nepal. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2011;Jun;8(2):225–46.
33.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978;Nov 1;2(6):429–44.
34.
Frija A, Wossink A, Buysse J, Speelman S, Van Huylenbroeck G. Irrigation pricing policies and its impact on agricultural inputs demand in Tunisia: A DEA-based methodology. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;Sep 1;92(9):2109–18.
35.
Hu XJ, Xiong YC, Li YJ, Wang JX, Li FM, Wang HY, et al. Integrated water resources management and water users’ associations in the arid region of northwest China: A case study of farmers’ perceptions. Journal of Environmental Management. 2014;Dec 1;145:162–9.
36.
Kulshrestha M, Vishwakarma A. Efficiency evaluation of urban water supply services in an Indian state. Water Policy. 2012;Feb 1;15(1):134–52.
37.
Mccarthy N, Essam T. Impact of water user associations on agricultural productivity in Chile. Washington, DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 2009;Aug:1–31.
38.
Muchara B, Ortmann G, Wale E, Mudhara M. Collective action and participation in irrigation water management: A case study of Mooi River Irrigation Scheme in KwaZulu-Natal Province. South Africa Water SA. 2014 Nov 18;40(4):699–708.
39.
Narain V. Institutions, technology and water control: Water users associations and irrigation management reform in two large-scale systems in India. Wageningen University and Research. 2003;(1–2).
40.
Nyathikala SA, Kulshrestha M. Performance Measurement of Water Supply Services: A Cross-Country Comparison between India and the UK. Environmental Management. 2020;Oct;66(4):517–34.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
