×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

SORPTION OF COPPER AND ZINC BY GOETHITE AND HEMATITE

By
Alexandra Bekényiová ,
Alexandra Bekényiová
Contact Alexandra Bekényiová

Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Iveta Štyriaková ,
Iveta Štyriaková

Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Zuzana Danková
Zuzana Danková

Department of Physical and physicochemical mineral processing methods, Institute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Abstract

In the present work, the abilities of natural and synthetic samples of goethite and hematite to remove copper Cu(II) ) and zinc Zn(II) ions from aqueous solutions were compared. Batch adsorption experiments were performed in order to evaluate the removal efficiency of iron oxide samples. The effect of initial metal ion concentration, initial pH and time on adsorption of copper and zinc onto the iron oxides has been studied. The sorption data were represented by the linearized Langmuir model. Comparing the values of adsorption capacities, there were differences between the natural and synthetic samples, natural and synthetic goethite had higher sorption capacity for both metals than hematite. The copper ions showed higher affinity than zinc ions to all samples.

References

1.
Shawabkeh RA, Rockstraw DA, Bhada RK. Copper and strontium adsorption by a novel carbon material manufactured from pecan shells. Carbon. 2002;40(5):781–6.
2.
Moore JW, Ramamoorthy S, S. Organic Chemicals in Natural Waters – Applied Monitoring and Impact Assessment. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica. 1986;14(2):289.
3.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR.
4.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA.
5.
Aslam MM, Hassan I, Malik M, Matin A. Removal of copper from industrial effluent by adsorption with economical viable material. J Environ Agric Food Chem. 2004;3(2):658–64.
6.
Kooner ZS. Comparative study of adsorption behavior of copper, lead and zinc ontho goethite in aqueous system. Environmental Geology. 1993;21:242–50.
7.
Schwertmann U, Cornell RM. Iron Oxides in the Laboratory: Preparation and Characterization. 2000.
8.
Aylor RM, McKenzie RM. The influence of aluminium on iron oxides. Clays Clay Miner. 1980;28:179–87.
9.
Cornell RMS, U. The Iron oxides, 2nd. 2003. p. 664.
10.
Goldberg S, C.T J. Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;234:204–16.
11.
Schlegel. EXAFS study of zinc and Zn EDTA sorption at the goethite (α-FeOOH)-wate interface. J Phys. 1997;IV:823–4.
12.
Bochatay. EXAFS study of copper at water- goethite (α-FeOOH) interface. J Phys. 1997;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.