The “product” of architecture, as something that is created by the architect in a “design process”, along with other effective materialistic and environmental factors, depends on the worldview of the architect as the pioneer and director of the process. In fact, the architect‟s definition of human being and his aspects of existence on one hand and his needs and objectives on the other, determine “how” and “in what direction” the design process will proceed. It also reveals how the data intended for designing will be gathered, and “for achieving what goals” and “meeting what needs” they are processed. The present enquiry is an attempt to investigate how the character and characteristics of the architect‟s worldview will affect the steps and characteristics of the design process. Therefore, first, an architectural design process will be established step by step, and then, the effects of the worldview on them will be studied; and consequently the components influenced by the worldview will be analyzed. Based on the nature of this paper, the descriptive-analytical methodology and inductive reasoning were used. Also, the required data were gathered by desk study.
Aerts D. World views: from fragmentation to integration. Internet Edition. 2007;
2.
M A. Worldview, an integral part of patterns design program. vice president of strategic planning and monitoring. Vol. 340. 2009. p. 17–20.
3.
B L. How designers think. 2005.
4.
Lupton E, Phillips J. Becoming a graphic designer: A guide to design. 2011.
5.
A AA. Piece writing, a process in architectural design: detection of hidden images. 2008.
6.
Popper KR. Creative Self-Criticism in Science and in Art, In Search of a Better World. 1994.
7.
Aken JE. On the design of design processes in architecture and engineering: Technological rules and the principle of minimal specification. 2003.
8.
Chan CS. Cognitive processes in architectural design problem solving. Design Studies. 1990;11(2):60–80.
9.
Simon HA. The Sciences of the artificial. 1969.
10.
Gann DM, J. SA, K WJ. Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking. Building research and information. 2003;31(5):318–33.
11.
Arçan EF, Evçi F. Yapi bilgisi çalismalari mimari tasarima yaklasim. Mimarlik Kitaplari Dizisi-1. 1992.
12.
Mitchel WJ. A Tale of Two Cities. Architecture and Digital Revolution Science. 1999;285:839–41.
13.
Markus TA. Building Performance. 1972.
14.
Fizička geologija Ljubomir Rokić.
15.
J T. The relationship between design and study: An Inquiry into the theoretical foundations of how to link research to architectural design. Journal of Soffe. 2013;56:7–22.
16.
K P. Logic of Scientific Discovery. 2005.
17.
McGonigle D, Mastrian K. Nursing Informatics and the foundation of knowledge. 2011.
18.
Feather J, Sturges P. International encyclopedia of information and library science. 2013.
19.
A E. What is information? The concept of information and views of some experts in the professional references and some librarian scholars. Quarterly of national studies on librarianship and information organization. 2010;61:29–34.
20.
Archer JB. Systematic method for designers: developments in design methodology. 1963.
21.
Özcan T, Çelebi N, Esnaf Ş. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011;38(8):9773–9.
22.
L. G, D W. Architectural research methods. 2013.
23.
Volker L. Deciding About Design Quality. 2010.
24.
Dahl P. Managing end-user feedback in sustainable project delivery. 2008.
25.
Conway H, Roenish R. Understanding architecture: an introduction to architecture and architectural history. 1994.
26.
Leucking S. Principles of Three Dimensional Design: Objects, Space and Meaning. 2002.
27.
Rapoport A. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. 1990.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
