The bridge's span structure comprises a connected beam designed to support a concrete slab poured over parallel steel supports. Simultaneously, segmental construction, shrinkage, and the flow of concrete play a significant role in stress redistribution over time. The span construction is statically indeterminate due to its connections with the abutments, and temporal deformations occur under additional complex conditions. In this analysis, we employed a calculation model based on the layered finite elements method developed by the authors. This model can be utilized to analyse both statically indeterminate supports and the predicted phased construction method. It accounts for changes in the static system and loading, as well as variations in the layers within the coupled section and the viscous properties of the concrete over time. The calculation analysis results reveal that viscous concrete deformations, combined with different moments of activation of individual segments, have a significant impact on stress redistribution over time. Such intricate analyses are indispensable for ensuring the required safety and cost-effectiveness of the bridge span construction.
Ranzi G, Leoni G, Zandonini R. State of the art on the time-dependent behaviour of composite steel-concrete structure. Journal of constructional steel research. 2013;80:252–63.
2.
Ding M, Jiang X, Lin Z, Ju J. Long-term stress of simply supported steel-concrete compozite beams. The Open Construction and Building Technology J. 2011;5:1–7.
3.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications, SI Units. Vol. 4. 2007.
4.
Design of Concrete Structures – part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Vol. 2, Eurocode. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 2004.
5.
Eurocodes 3 and 4 – Application to steel-concrete composite road bridges, Guidance book, Sétra, Department of the French Ministry of transport. 2007.
6.
El Sarraf R, Iles D, Montahan A, Easey D, Hicks S. Steel-concrete composite bridge design guide. NZ Transport Agency research report 525; 2013.
7.
Telford T. CEB-FIP: Model Code. 1990.
8.
FIB Model Code. 2010.
9.
ACI 209R-02: Prediction of creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects in concrete structures. ACI Committee; 2002.
10.
Bažant EdZ, Wiley AA. Mathematical Modeling of Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete. Int.. Public; 1988.
11.
Partov D, Kantchev V. Eurocode 2 provision against standards (ACI 209R-92 and Gardner&Lockman models) in creep analysis of composite steel-concrete section. Engineering Mechanics. 2015;22(2):109–27.
12.
Vayas I, Iliopoulos A. A.: Design of steel-concrete comosite bridges to eurocodes. CRC Press; 2014.
13.
Hendy CR, R. J. Designers guide to EN 1994-2 Eurocodes 4: Design of steel and comosite structures, Part 2: General rules and rules for bridges. 2004.
14.
Al-Darzi SY, Chen A. Conceptual design and analysis of steel-concrete comosite bridges: State of the Art, Steel Strustures. 2006. p. 393–407.
15.
R. F, Radonjanin V, Malešev M. Design and Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structure“. Introductinary - Invited paper on 6th Greek National Conference on Metal Structures, Athens: Greek Association for Metal Structures. 2008. p. 72–87.
16.
Sassone M, Casalegno C. Evaluation of the structural response to the time-dependent behaviour of concrete: Part 2 – A general computational approach. Vol. 86, ICJ The Indian Concrete Journal. 2012. p. 39–51.
17.
Wang GM, Zhu L, Zhou GP, Han B, Ji WY. Experimental Research of the Time-Dependent Effects of Steel–Concrete Composite Girder Bridges during Construction and Operation Periods. Vol. 13, Materials. p. 2123.
18.
Cardoso RA. Design of comosite steel and concrete bridges. Univeridade de Aveiro Dep. de Eng. Civil, Arno; 2015.
19.
Kim S. Creep and shrinkage effects on steel-concrete composite beams, Master Thesis.
20.
Kostić S, Deretić-Stojanović B, Stošić S. Redistribution effects in linear elastic analyses of continuous composite steel-concrete beams according to Eurocode 4“. Vol. 9, Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2011. p. 133–45.
21.
Nguyen QHH, M. Nonlinear time-dependent behaviour of composite steel-concrete beams. Hal. 2015;
22.
Chiorino MA, Carreira DJ. Factors affecting creep and shrinkage os hardened concrete and guide for modelling, Theme: Creep and Shrinkage, A state-of-the-art report on international recommendations and scientific debate. Vol. 86, ICJ The Indian Concrete Journal. 2012. p. 11–24.
23.
Collin P, Nilsson M, Häggström J. International Workshop on Eurocode 4-2, Composite Bridges. Technical report, Stockholm; 2011.
24.
Macorini L, Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, B.A. I. Long-term analysis of steel-concrete composite beams; FE modelling for effective with evaluation. Vol. 28, Engineering Structures. 2006. p. 1110–31.
25.
F. G, L. D, G. L. A beam finite elerment including shear lag effect for the time-dependent analysis of steel-concrete composite decks. Vol. 31, Eng. Struct. 2009. p. 1888–902.
26.
Reginato LH, Tamoyo JL, Morsch IB. Finite element study of effective width in steel-concrete composite beams under long-term service load, Latin Amer J. of Solid and Structures. Vol. 15. 2018. p. 15.
27.
Bradford MA, Gilbert RI. Time-dependent behaviour of simply supported steel-composite beams,. Vol. No. R-286, The University of New South Wales, SCE. UNICIV Report; 1991.
28.
Dezi L, Leoni G, A.M T. Creep and shrinkage analysis of composite beams, Composite construction. Constr. Research Communications Limited. 1998. p. 170–7.
29.
Souici A, Tehrani M, Rahal N, Bekkouche MSB. Berehet: Creep effect on composite beam with perfect steel-concrete connection. Vols. 15, 2, Steel structures. 2015. p. 433–45.
30.
Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, Macorini L. Finite-element model for collapse and long-term analysis of steel-concrete composite beams, ASCE. Journal of structural engineering. 2004;489–97.
31.
Chen F, Ai Z, Zhou L, Wang C, Hou S. Research on Simulation Method of Steel-Concrete Composite Beam with Finite Element. Vol. 719, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. p. 022035.
32.
Gholamhoseini A, R.I. G, M.A. B. A simplified method for calculation of long-term deflections in composite slabs. Steel Innovationa Auckland, N. Zealand; 2015.
33.
Yao K, Zhou D, Y. H, Wu S. The simplified algorithm to the simple-supported steel and concrete comosite beam, Hindawi. Vol. Article ID 4951080, Computational Inteligence and Neuroscience. 2022. p. 10.
34.
Zhang C, Shao CS, Changyuan Q, D. An experimental study on negative banding behaviour of composite bridge decks with steel-fiber-reinforced concrete and longitunal buld-flat ribs,. I. J. of steel structures. 2023.
35.
Niu Y, Tang Y. Effect of Shear Creep on Long-Term Deformation Analysis of Long-Span Concrete Girder Bridge. Vol. 2019, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. p. 1–10.
36.
Morano SG, Mannini C. PreflexBeams: A method of calculation of creep and shrinkage effects, ASCE. Journal of Bridge Engineering. :48–58.
37.
Cumbo A, Folić R. Layered finite elements in the analysis of composite structures exposed to long-term effect. Građevinar. 2017;69(11):991–1005.
38.
Cumbo A. Analisis rheollogical properties influences of composite structures by layered finite elements. Ph Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Niš; 2017.
39.
Johnson R, P. Composite structures of steel and concrete. Blackwall P., Therd Edition, Oxford; 2004.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
