The main subject of this manuscript is mountain streams used by construction of small hydro power plants. The motivation for this research stemmed from a number of conflicting opinions about the justification of the construction of small hydropower plants and their facilities. This research encompasses different methods for the analysis of the justification of the construction of a small hydropower plant, starting from tradition in correlation with water mills, through a techno-economic approach to a complex multi-criteria research model. All methods are represented by objective formulas.
World experiences are also presented, through the level of potential utilization, compared to the degree of development. The possible positive and negative impacts of the construction of such facilities for the exploitation of the potential of small watercourses were analyzed. After the conducted research, and with respect to the principle of minimum energy, which has become the paradigm of modern civilization, it can be concluded that using the potential of small watercourses by building small hydropower plants belongs to the domain of using renewable energy sources and that it is a function of sustainable development.
Decision makers are recommended to exclusively apply a multi-criteria methodology, which can holistically include all technical, economic, environmental, social and other non-profitable but important impacts.
Ivković Z, Tošić D, Dramlić D. Analysis of coal reserves with the potential for underground exploitation in the Republic of Serbia. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2022;26(1):43–8.
2.
Mahabadi D. Enhancing fairness in the Paris Agreement: lessons from the Montreal and Kyoto protocols and the path ahead. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development. 2023;22(3):329–48.
3.
Schneider M, Golan G, Yang S, Kinsey D. US public diplomacy since 9/11: The challenges of integration. In: International public relations and public diplomacy. 2015. p. 15–36.
4.
Punys P, Kvaraciejus A, Dumbrauskas A, Šilinis L, Popa B. An assessment of micro-hydropower potential at historic watermill, weir, and non-powered dam sites in selected EU countries. Renewable energy. 2019;133:1108–23.
5.
Stevović S, Milošević H, Stevović I, Hadrovic S. Sustainable management of water resources in Prokletije region. Industrija. 2014;42(1):47–61.
6.
Ali S, Stewart RA, Sahin O, Vieira AS. Integrated GIS-AHP-based approach for off-river pumped hydro energy storage site selection. Applied Energy. 2023;337:120914.
7.
Stevović I. Strategic orientation to solar energy production and long term financial benefits. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2017;17:1–12.
8.
Urošević BG, Marinović B. Ranking construction of small hydro power plants using multi-criteria decision analysis. Renewable Energy. 2021;172:1174–83.
9.
Pan Y, Hashemizadeh A. Circular economy-based assessment framework for enhancing sustainability in renewable energy development with life cycle considerations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2023;103:107–289.
10.
Taherdoost H. Analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW) as a multiattribute decision-making technique: A step-by-step guide. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research. 2023;6(1):21–4.
11.
Yang X, Xu Z, Xu J. Large-scale group Delphi method with heterogeneous decision information and dynamic weights. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023;213:118782.
12.
Wagner B, Hauer C, Habersack H. Current hydropower developments in Europe. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2019;37:41–9.
13.
Bogaart P. The potential for sustainable hydropower. Nature Water. 2023;1(1):22–3.
14.
Gaugl R, Sommer M, Kettner C, Bachhiesl U, Klatzer T, Gruber L, et al. Integrated Power and Economic Analysis of Austria’s Renewable Electricity Transformation. Energies. 2023;16(5):2229.
15.
Couto TB, Olden JD. Global proliferation of small hydropower plants–science and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2018;16(2):91–100.
16.
Engen S, Hausner VH, Fauchald P, Ruud A, Broderstad EG. Small hydropower, large obstacle? Exploring land use conflict, Indigenous opposition and acceptance in the Norwegian Arctic. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023;95:102888.
17.
Kakoulaki G, Sanchez RG, Amillo AG, Szabó S, Felice M, Farinosi F, et al. Benefits of pairing floating solar photovoltaics with hydropower reservoirs in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023;171:112989.
18.
Gebara CH, Laurent A. National SDG-7 performance assessment to support achieving sustainable energy for all within planetary limits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023;173:112934.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
