This research paper focuses on evaluating the log piling technique as a sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solution for reducing soil liquefaction risks during earthquakes. Although this method has been used extensively in Japan, mainly aiming for complete soil layer penetration, its economic viability is questionable in cases requiring very deep soil improvements. The study highlights that shallow ground improvement can notably enhance the seismic behavior of the soil-improvement-structure system, as evidenced by the reduced total and penetration settlements caused by liquefaction. The paper presents a methodology for determining the optimal dimensions of the modified ground zone using both small and medium-scale 1-g shaking table tests.
The small-scale tests involve a detailed parametric study, examining variables like improvement width, pile spacing, and the depth-to-thickness ratio of the improved layer. Medium-scale tests, on the other hand, are geared towards identifying the minimum effective pile length. This approach provides a practical guideline for engineers to implement log piling for small residential buildings. Additionally, the paper utilizes finite element method (FEM) effective stress analysis, incorporating a PLAXIS 2D-based constitutive model (PM4Sand) calibrated with laboratory undrained cyclic torsional tests. This model accounts for the changes in effective stress during seismic activities. Finally, the study correlates its numerical findings with the results from the 1-g shaking table experiments, offering a well-rounded perspective on the effectiveness of log piling in mitigating liquefaction risks during seismic events
Tani K, Kiyota T, Matsushita K, Hashimoto. Y, A. T, H. N, et al. Liquefaction countermeasures by shallow ground improvement for houses and their cost analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2015;(79):401–14.
2.
Riaz SN, A. M, K. I, H., Hori T. The Effect of Log Piling on Liquefaction. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers. 2014;2:144–58.
3.
Numata A, Murata T, Riaz S, Mimura K, Hara T. Effect of log piling method for liquefaction countermeasures by large-scale shaking table test. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers (Structural and Earthquake Engineering. 2015;71(4):274–83.
4.
Miwa S, Yoshida M, Murata T, Numata A. Shaking table tests and numerical analysis on log piling as a liquefaction countermeasure for existing houses. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers A1 (Structural and Earthquake Engineering. 2016;72(4):117–28.
5.
Serikawa Y, Yoshida M, Miyajima M. Study on liquefaction countermeasure technique by log piling for existing residential houses. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers A1 (Structural and Earthquake Engineering. 2016;72(4):489–95.
6.
Hatanaka M, Suzuki Y, Miyaki M, Tsukuni S. Some Factors Affecting the Settlement of Structures Due to Sand Liquefaction in Shaking Table Tests. Soils and Foundations. 1987;27(ue 1):94–101.
7.
Yoshimi Y, Tokimatsu K. Settlement of Buildings on Saturated Sand During Earthquakes. Soils and Foundations. 1977;17(1):23–38.
8.
Iai S. Similitude for Shaking Table Tests on Soil-Structure-Fluid Model in 1g Gravitational Field. Soils and Foundations. 1989;29(ue 1):105–18.
9.
Kiyota T, Koseki J, Sato T. Comparison of liquefaction-induced ground deformation between results from undrained cyclic torsional shear tests and observations form previous model tests and case studies. Soils and Foundations. 2010;50:421–9.
10.
Dafalias YF, Manzari MT. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE. 2004;130(6):622–34.
11.
Boulanger RW, Ziotopoulou K. PM4Sand (Version 3.1): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. 2017.
12.
P.L.A.X.I.S. PLAXIS 2D Reference Manual. 2019.
13.
Osawa S, Milev N, Kiyota T, Shiga M, Ito R, Katagiri T, et al. Shaking table tests to evaluate liquefaction mitigation effect of log piling technique in application to shallow ground improvement. In: Proc Of 17th Danube – European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering (17DECGE. 2023.
14.
Agency FD. Notification specifying detailed provisions of technical criteria for regulating dangerous articles. 1974.
15.
Tsuchida H, Iai S, Kurata E. On zone of soil property improvement of soils. In: Proc of 14th Meeting of Earthquake Engineering. 1976. p. 9–12.
16.
Society NZG. Earthquake geotechnical engineering practice – Module 5: Ground improvement of soils prone to liquefaction. 2017.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
