Quality Management Systems (QMS) are increasingly the method of agribusiness addressing consumer demand for quality and transparency. These systems also play a crucial role in ensuring sustainable production, particularly in the face of climate change and regulatory pressures. The need to improve efficiencies in controlling production is becoming increasingly important. The aim is to highlight the benefits of QMS implementation within agribusiness, particularly in enhancing operational and sustainable efficiency. The application and concept of QMS will be explained, along with the potential benefits related to its adoption. The challenges of QMS execution will be analyzed, and the potential impact of QMS on product quality and environmental sustainability will be assessed. The study's report points to significant gains for the adoption of ISO standards after 2018: quality management, ISO 9001:2015 (1,265,216 certificates at 1,666,172 sites); environmental management, ISO 14001:2015 (529,853 certifications at 744,428 sites); and occupational health and safety, SO 45001:2018 (45,459 certifications at 51,535 sites). The article demonstrates that the adoption of QMS in agribusiness improves product quality and helps conserve natural resources. It also mirrors a favourable tendency in unifying quality management with sustainable operations. Consequently, the results of the research substantiated the practitioner’s claims on the capacity of QMS to guide agribusiness towards a more sustainable future. A culture of ‘quality’ and ‘continuous improvement’ becomes a powerful factor in arming companies to cope with the vagaries of modern-day production.
Antony J, Bhat S, Sony M, Fundin A, Sorqvist L, Molteni R. Sustainable development through quality management: a multiple-case study analysis of triumphs, trials and tribulations. The TQM Journal.
2.
Blackburn H, Hiemstra SJ, Tixier-Boichard M. Quality management for improved organization and implementation. In: InInnovations in cryoconservation of AnGR 2022.
3.
Bohdaniuk I, Kolisnichenko V, Ustymenko O. AUDIT AS A FORM OF CONTROL OF THE STATE FINANCIAL INSPECTION OF UKRAINE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 4(5):31.
4.
Borsellino V, Schimmenti E, El Bilali H. Agri-Food Markets towards Sustainable Patterns. Sustainability. 12(6):2193.
5.
Obeidat A, Yaqbeh R. Business Project Management Using Genetic Algorithm for the Marketplace Administration. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security.
6.
Burton RJ, Forney J, Stock P, Sutherland LA. The good farmer: Culture and identity in food and agriculture. Routledge.
7.
Diakite K, Bilivogui P, Wenfang F, Quan HS. The Quality Management System Implementation Issues in Agribusiness Industries: Evidence from the Guinea Republic. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences.
8.
Eggert A, Ulaga W, Gehring A. Managing customer success in business markets: Conceptual foundation and practical application. SMR-Journal of Service Management Research. 18;4(2-3):121-132.
9.
Favargiotti S, Zantedeschi G, Pianegonda A, Brunelli M, Urbani M. Designing Food Hubs for Territories of Proximity: Assessing the Spatial, Ecological, and Cultural Potentials of Places through Multi-Criteria Decision Support Systems. Land. 13(8):1131.
10.
Fiocco D, Ganesan V, Serrana Lozano MG, Agtech SH. Breaking down the farmer adoption dilemma.
11.
Geneme D. Analysis and Improvement of Product Quality in Small Scale and Medium Enterprises (A Case study on Small and Medium Scale Metal Manufacturing Enterprises in Mizan-Aman Town.
12.
Khalife DrD, Subrahmanyam DrS, Farah DrA. A Sustainable Circular Business Model to Improve the Performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Using Blockchain Technology. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications. 2022;15(2):240–50.
13.
Standards G. ISO Survey results 2018.
14.
Halkin A, Bliumska-Danko K, Smihunova O, Dudnyk E, Balandina I. Investigation influence of store type on emotional state of consumer in the urban purchase. Foundations of Management. 11(1):7–22.
15.
Heriyati P, Yadav N, Tamara D. Accomplishing sustainable development goals through international management system standards and multinational supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024;33(6):5214–31.
16.
Hutsaliuk O, Koval V, Tsimoshynska O, Koval M, Skyba H. Risk Management of Forming Enterprises Integration Corporate Strategy. TEM Journal. 1;9(4):1514-1523.
17.
Topalova I, Lozova T, Riepnova T, Dashchenko N, Chudaieva I, Darushyn O. Business Process Management in Entrepreneurial Activity Based on a Platform Approach. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2024;14(2):46–55.
18.
University IS. Center for Industrial Research and Service. Quality management systems for agriculture: Principles and case studies.
19.
I.S.O. ISO Survey 2020 with 20000‐1 analysis.
20.
ISO/CASCO The ISO survey of management system standard certifications.
21.
Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Suman R. Enhancing smart farming through the applications of Agriculture 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Intelligent Networks.
22.
Kotvytska N, Bohdaniuk I, Kukhar O. KEY ASPECTS AND PROCESS OF FORMATION OF THE MECHANISM FOR ENSURING ECONOMIC SECURITY OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 10(1):145–52.
23.
Kalinin O, Gonchar V, Abliazova N, Filipishyna L, Onofriichuk O, Maltsev M. Enhancing Economic Security through Digital Transformation in Investment Processes: Theoretical Perspectives and Methodological Approaches Integrating Environmental Sustainability. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 5;9(1):26-45.
24.
Kovalenko M, Ziuz D, Smihunova O, Bondar N, Omelchenko H. Implementation of state economic policy under corporatocracy: Financial and credit aspect. Public Policy and Administration. 16;19(3):36-47.
25.
Makhaye PM. The influence of global sourcing on local firms’ competitiveness, supply chain competence and performance in the sugar sector in South Africa.
26.
Malyarets L, Draskovic M, Babenko V, et al. Theory and practice of controlling at enterprises in international business. Economic Annals-ХХI. 2017;165(5–6):90–6.
27.
Mengistu Y. Practices and Challenges in Implementation of Quality Management System/ISO-9001: 2015: The Case of Agro-Food Industries in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
28.
Nain MS, Singh R, Mishra. Relevance of good agricultural practices in organic production systems. In: Modern Concepts and Practices of Organic Farming for Safe Secured and Sustainable Food Production.
29.
Nosach N, Druhova O, Klepikova S. CONTROLLING AS A COMPONENT OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN AGRO-INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 9(5):186–92.
30.
Phologane SA. Integration of risk management system: towards a sustained access to EU citrus market.
31.
Polyakova Y, Lypovyi D, Yehiozarian A. MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS FOR THE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISES USING A CONTROLLING SYSTEM WITH INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 9(5):223–9.
32.
Development QI. QI Data: The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications. Posted on September. 16.
33.
Senyk Y, Senchyk I, Nosach N. STRATEGIC CONTROLLING TOOLS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF UKRAINIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANIES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 10(1):92–8.
34.
Nguyen T, HT P, HM H, TT T. An integrated model of supply chain quality management, Industry 3.5 and innovation to improve manufacturers’ performance–a case study of Vietnam. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 1;27(2):261-283.
35.
Yankovyi O, Hutsaliuk O, Tomareva-Patlakhova V, Shmatko N, Kabanova O, Rud Y. Comprehensive forecasting of interconnected socio-economic indicators as a methodological basis for adopting optimal management. In: IEEE International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA.
36.
Zhou X, Zhu Q, Xu Z. The mediating role of supply chain quality management for traceability and performance improvement: Evidence among Chinese food firms. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022;254:108630.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
