×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

ANALYZING THE INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS ON CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT MARKETS

By
Arasuraja Ganesan Orcid logo ,
Arasuraja Ganesan

St. Joseph’s Institute of Technology India

R. Velanganni Orcid logo ,
R. Velanganni

BS Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology India

Vijayakanthan Selvaraj Orcid logo ,
Vijayakanthan Selvaraj

SRM Institute of Science and Technology , Chennai , India

M. Rajapriya Orcid logo
M. Rajapriya

Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology , Chennai , India

Abstract

The paper discusses the application of behavioral economics in consumer decision-making in the sustainable product market. Behavioral economics is contrasted to the traditional economic theory, which assumes rationality of choices based on the maximization of utility, where behavioral factors, including psychological biases, social norms, and emotional reactions, are included to explain real-life behavior. The paper has emphasized that consumers tend to make irrational decisions because of biases such as loss aversion, framing effects, and limited attention. There was a strong positive correlation between social norms and willingness to pay, with consumers who viewed sustainability to be a social norm experiencing greater willingness to pay an average of 7.14% more to purchase eco-friendly products. Also, affective attitudes towards sustainability enhanced their willingness to pay an average of 6.03 % with emotionally satisfied consumers about their purchase. These psychological factors play a great role in determining what is procured in terms of green products. Through the examination of pricing schemes, marketing schemes, and social forces, the paper recommends that companies develop better arrangements that would facilitate the development of sustainable consumption. Also, the research highlights the promise of such policy interventions as nudges and eco-labeling to promote sustainable decisions. The discussion shows that the gap between purchase behavior and intentions in the environment can be closed by learning about consumer behavior based on the behavioral economics approach. Future studies ought to determine the long-term impact of behavioral interventions, the influence of emotional relationships on consumer loyalty, and how new technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI), can be used to shape sustainability-related decisions.

References

1.
Gupta R, Dwivedi J, Mathur A. The Role of Behavioral Economics in Consumer Decision-Making Towards Sustainable Products. InNudging Green: Behavioral Economics and Environmental Sustainability 2024 Aug 13 (pp. 49-65). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
2.
Chen CW. Utilizing a hybrid approach to identify the importance of factors that influence consumer decisionmaking behavior in purchasing sustainable products. Sustainability. 2024 May 23;16(11):4432.
3.
ul Abidin M, Zahid F. Behavioral Economics in Green Marketing: Impact of Consumer Behavior on Sustainable Business Practices in the Fashion Industry. Sarhad Journal of Management Sciences. 2025 Jun 30;11(1):21-34.
4.
Anbarasu V, PD S. Analysis and Prediction of Crime against Women Using Machine Learning Techniques. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 5183-5188.
5.
Maniatis P. Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016 Sep 20;132:215-28.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.