×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF INFLUENCER REPUTATION ON ONLINE PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR: THE SEQUENTIAL MEDIATING ROLES OF PARASOCIAL INTERACTION AND PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY

By
N. Dhivya Lakshmi Orcid logo ,
N. Dhivya Lakshmi
Contact N. Dhivya Lakshmi

Research Scholar, Faculty of Management, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Vadapalani Campus , Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India

Vijayakanthan Selvaraj Orcid logo
Vijayakanthan Selvaraj

Assistant Professor (Senior Grade), Faculty of Management, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Vadapalani Campus , Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India

Abstract

This study investigates how the reputation of social media influencers affects online prosocial behaviour, focusing on the sequential mediating roles of parasocial interaction and perceived homophily. Grounded in Source Credibility Theory, Parasocial Interaction Theory, the Similarity-Attraction Paradigm, and Social Cognitive Theory, the research addresses a critical gap in understanding the psychological pathways linking influencer traits to socially beneficial outcomes. The study specifically explores male followers of fashion and grooming influencers on platforms such as Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. A cross-sectional design was employed using purposive sampling. Data were collected from 459 male social media users who follow at least one male fashion/grooming influencer. Validated scales were used to measure influencer reputation, parasocial interaction, perceived homophily, and online prosocial behaviour. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to test the hypothesized sequential mediation model. Findings reveal that influencer reputation positively predicts both parasocial interaction and perceived homophily, which, in turn, significantly influence online prosocial behavior. The strongest mediator was perceived homophily, followed by parasocial interaction. Notably, the sequential mediation path from influencer reputation to prosocial behavior via parasocial interaction and perceived homophily was statistically significant, underscoring the dual affective and cognitive mechanisms at play. The statistical results indicated that perceived homophily is positively influenced by the influencer's reputation (β = 0.998, t = 58.393, p < .001) and prosocial behavior (β = 0.574, t = 2.381, p = .017). This study contributes to influencer marketing literature by shifting the focus from commercial outcomes to prosocial digital behaviors. Practical implications suggest that brands should collaborate with reputable influencers who evoke emotional bonds and perceived similarity with their followers to foster socially responsible engagement online.

References

1.
Casaló LV, Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S. Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of business research. 2020 Sep 1;117:510-9.
2.
Chung S, Cho H. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & marketing. 2017 Apr;34(4):481-95.
3.
De Veirman M, Cauberghe V, Hudders L. Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International journal of advertising. 2017 Sep 3;36(5):798-828.
4.
Djafarova E, Trofimenko O. ‘Instafamous’–credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, communication & society. 2019 Aug 24;22(10):1432-46.
5.
Erreygers S, Vandebosch H, Vranjes I, Baillien E, De Witte H. Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media. 2018 Oct 2;12(4):448-64.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.