×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

APPLYING THE 4PS MARKETING MODEL TO EVALUATE THE SUCCESS OF E-COMMERCE STRATEGIES IN CONSUMER RETENTION

By
Arasuraja Ganesan Orcid logo ,
Arasuraja Ganesan
Contact Arasuraja Ganesan

Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, St.Joseph’s College of Engineering, OMR , Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India

G.H. Kerinab Beenu Orcid logo ,
G.H. Kerinab Beenu

Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, Jerusalem College of Engineering, Pallikaranai , Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India

V. Aruna Orcid logo ,
V. Aruna

Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, St.Joseph’s Institute of Technolgy, OMR , Chennai, Tamil Nadu , India

K. Rajamani Orcid logo
K. Rajamani

Associate Professor (Senior Grade), Mepco School of Management Studies, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College , Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu , India

Abstract

This study examines how well e-commerce tactics work to encourage client retention in digital retail settings using the 4Ps Marketing Strategy (Product, Place, Price, and Promotion). The study addresses the gap of missing an integrated quantitative framework capable of systematically linking the conventional marketing mix dimensions with measurable customer retention results on e-commerce platforms. 356 active e-commerce customers from various Indian online buying platforms provided data for the current study, which used a method of quantitative investigation based on a cross-sectional survey design.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the gathered responses in order to look into the connections between various marketing mix constructions, customer satisfaction, and consumer retention behaviour. The measuring constructs' convergent validity and reliability were tested using Cronbach's alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), and Average Variance Extracted (AVE), which produced results above the suggested cut-off. The findings demonstrate that the retention and satisfaction of client outcomes are significantly impacted by all four marketing mix variables. The product had the greatest impact on customer satisfaction (β = 0.41, p < 0.001), followed by Promotion (β = 0.36, p < 0.001), Price (β = 0.29, p < 0.01), and Place (β = 0.22, p < 0.05). Additionally, having a path coefficient of 0.73, customer satisfaction significantly influenced customer retention. With an R2 of 0.68, the suggested model demonstrated a good explanatory power, meaning that the combined 4Ps framework accounted for 68% of the variance in retention of customers. The study concludes that the customer-focused execution of marketing mix strategies significantly impacts the retention performance of the e-commerce ecosystem and provides a statistically verified framework for measuring the effectiveness of digital marketing.

References

1.
Abdullah MS. Examining The Effect Of AI-Powered Personalization On Customer Loyalty: A Meta-Analysis Of E-Commerce Studies. Review of Applied Science and Technology. 2025 Jun 15;4(02):309-38.
2.
Hao H, Guo J, Xin Z, Qiao J. Research on e-commerce distribution optimization of rice agricultural products based on consumer satisfaction. IEEE Access. 2021 Sep 27;9:135304-15.
3.
Kim J, Yum K. Enhancing continuous usage intention in e-commerce marketplace platforms: The effects of service quality, customer satisfaction, and trust. Applied Sciences. 2024 Aug 28;14(17):7617.
4.
Yadav M, Rahman Z. The influence of social media marketing activities on customer loyalty: A study of e-commerce industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2018 Nov 29;25(9):3882-905.
5.
Kumar R, Jain V, Eastman JK, Ambika A. The components of perceived quality and their influence on online re-purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2025 Jan 2;42(1):38-55.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.