×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF EMBANKMENT ALONG THE RAILWAY ROUTE OF ENTITY BORDER OF FEDERATION OF BIH – MAGLAJ, SECTION km 103+500 MAGLAJ

By
Neđo Đurić
Neđo Đurić
Contact Neđo Đurić

Technical institute Bijeljina, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Railway route from entity border to Maglaj is on corridor V of railways that connects Adriatic sea with European Union countries. More precisely, it is on the railway Samac – Sarajevo that was built during the fifties. From Doboj to Zenica exist two tracks, one built in 1947. and the other thirty years later. In time, the railway worn out, since it was not maintained properly during its exploitation, so allowed train speed is 40 km/h. Reconstruction of railway had previously started on sections with aim to achieve the level of train speed to 120 km/h.

Terrain research in order to overview quality of material on which the railway is laid, and immediate environment that has effect on railway route, were conducted by sections, from which section km 103+500 – Maglaj is one of the most important considering characteristics of the terrain on which the route passes. Research along railway route were conducted by using research trial pits from both sides and in between tracks, to depth of entry in basic soil. Depth of research works is different for old and new track, considering the way of construction in time period of 30 years. Beyond narrow corridor of railway route research of characteristics of the terrain were not conducted, because of inability to access due to mining. Results of terrain and laboratory tests showed geotechnical characteristics of material, based on which were given quality improvement measures for deposited materials, and base for reconstruction of railway.

References

1.
Projekat. WB5-BiH-TRA-14.Glavna opravka pruge dionica Doboj – Maglaj i Jelina – Zenica na Koridoru Vc. FAZA II: Glavni Projekat, Dionica km 103+500 – Maglaj. Knjiga4 Geološko – geomehanički elaborat Tehnički institut Bijeljina. 2013;
2.
Projekat. WB5-BiH-TRA-14. Glavna opravka pruge dionica Doboj – Maglaj i Jelina – Zenica na Koridoru Vc FAZA II: Glavni projekat, Dionica Doboj – km 103+500. Knjiga 4. Geološko – geomehanički elaborat. 2013.
3.
BiH DCF. Direkcija za puteve Republike Srpske. Smjernice za projektovanje, gradjenje, održavanje i nadzor na putevima. Knjiga I, Dio 1, Poglavlje 2: Inženjerskogeološka i geotehnička istraživanja i ispitivanja. 2005.
4.
Ćulibrk SR. Geotehnički radovi u niskogradnji. Građevinski fakultet, Rudarsko-geološki fakultet. 1996.
5.
Đurić N, S T. Geotehnička svojstva materijala duž trase pruge Doboj –entitetska granica Republike Srpske. IX Naučno-stručno međunarodno savjetovanje “ocena stanja, održavanja i sanacije građevinskih objekata i naselja.” 2015.
6.
Đurić N, Skopljak F, Perišić M, Babajić A, Srkalović D. Stepen istraženosti terena za revitali-zaciju pruge na trasi entitetska granica Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine –Zanica. I kongres geologa Bosne i Hercegovine sa međunarodnim učešćem. 2015.
7.
Đurić N. Hidrogeološka i inženjerskogeološka istraživanja. 2011.
8.
Najdanović N, R O. Mehanika tla u inženjerskoj praksi.Beograd,Rudarski institut. 1979.
9.
Maksimović M. Mehanika tla, II izdanje. Građevinska knjiga. 2005.
10.
Eurocode 7. Geotechnical desing – Part 2: Desing assisted by laboratory testing, and Part 3: Desing assisted by fieldtesting. European Commitete for standarization Brussels. 1997;
11.
Đurić N, Tadić S, Babajić A, Srkalović D. Karakteristike terena duž trase pruge Doboj - Rječica, stac. In: km 84+400 do km 103+500 Šesto naučno-stručno međunarodno savjetovanje „Geotehnički aspekti građevinarstva“ Vršac, Srbija. 2015. p. 151–8.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.