×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

INFLUENCE AND PREDICTION OF SINTERED AGGREGATE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LIGHTWEIGHT ALKALI-ACTIVATED CONCRETE

By
Pushpendra Singh Palash ,
Pushpendra Singh Palash

MANIT-Bhopal, India

Priyanka Dhurvey Orcid logo
Priyanka Dhurvey

MANIT-Bhopal, India

Abstract

The most effective method for mitigating the adverse environmental impacts of traditional concrete involves substituting cement and natural aggregate with waste and byproduct resources. Utilizing sintered lightweight aggregate (fly ash) in geopolymer concrete emerges as an efficient solution for managing and disposing of significant amounts of fly ash. The influence of sintered aggregate size distribution on the performance of alkali-activated concrete, focusing on compressive strength improvement. The study employs sintered fly ash aggregate (SFA) as coarse aggregate, aiming to optimize packing density through proper particle distribution. The highest compressive strength is achieved with a mix featuring 75% 4-8mm and 25% 8-12mm SFA. Regression-based strength models are developed, exhibiting good alignment with conventional concrete models. Thin section techniques reveal enhanced aggregate-matrix interaction due to the porous structure of SFA. The study emphasizes the potential of SFA in geopolymer concrete for sustainable construction. Lightweight geopolymer concrete, owing to its lower density, significantly reduces the overall structural load.

References

1.
Aldawsari S, Kampmann R, Harnisch J, Rohde C. Setting Time, Microstructure, and Durability Properties of Low Calcium Fly Ash/Slag Geopolymer: A Review. Vol. 15, Materials. p. 876.
2.
Amin M, Elsakhawy Y, Abu el-hassan K, Abdelsalam BA. Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag. Vol. 16, Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022. p. e00976.
3.
Chu HH, Khan MA, Javed M, Zafar A, Khan MI, Alabduljabbar H, et al. Sustainable use of fly-ash: Use of gene-expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) for forecasting the compressive strength geopolymer concrete. Vol. 1;12(4):3603-3617, Ain Shams Engineering Journal.
4.
Domagała L. Durability of structural lightweight concrete with sintered fly ash aggregate. Vol. 14;13(20):4565, Materials.
5.
Gupta G, Sood H, Gupta PK. Mathematical modelling of resilient modulus response of fibre reinforced clay subgrade for pavement design. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics.
6.
Hamidi F, Valizadeh A, Aslani F. The effect of scoria, perlite and crumb rubber aggregates on the fresh and mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. In: Structures 2022 Apr. p. 895–909.
7.
Jena S, Panigrahi R. Performance assessment of geopolymer concrete with partial replacement of ferrochrome slag as coarse aggregate. Vol. 220, Construction and Building Materials. p. 525–37.
8.
Kuranlı ÖF, Uysal M, Abbas MT, Cosgun T, Niş A, Aygörmez Y, et al. Evaluation of slag/fly ash based geopolymer concrete with steel, polypropylene and polyamide fibers. Vol. 325, Construction and Building Materials. 2022. p. 126747.
9.
Miao R. High technology investment risk prediction using partial linear regression model under inequality constraints. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics.
10.
Saloni, Parveen, Pham TM, Lim YY, Malekzadeh M. Effect of pre-treatment methods of crumb rubber on strength, permeability and acid attack resistance of rubberised geopolymer concrete. Vol. 41, Journal of Building Engineering. 2021. p. 102448.
11.
Pham TM, Liu J, Tran P, Pang VL, Shi F, Chen W, et al. Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete. Vol. 265, Construction and Building Materials. 2020. p. 120753.
12.
Shi J, Liu Y, Wang E, Wang L, Li C, Xu H, et al. Physico-mechanical, thermal properties and durability of foamed geopolymer concrete containing cenospheres. Vol. 325, Construction and Building Materials. 2022. p. 126841.
13.
Soni N, Shukla DK. Analytical study on mechanical properties of concrete containing crushed recycled coarse aggregate as an alternative of natural sand. Vol. 266, Construction and Building Materials. 2021. p. 120595.
14.
Tayeh BA, Hakamy A, Amin M, Zeyad AM, Agwa IS. Effect of air agent on mechanical properties and microstructure of lightweight geopolymer concrete under high temperature. Vol. 16, Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022. p. e00951.
15.
Tayeh BA, Zeyad AM, Agwa IS, Amin M. Effect of elevated temperatures on mechanical properties of lightweight geopolymer concrete. Vol. 15, Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2021. p. e00673.
16.
Top S, Vapur H, Altiner M, Kaya D, Ekicibil A. Properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete prepared using pumice and expanded perlite as aggregates. Vol. 1202, Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020. p. 127236.
17.
Zeyad AM, Magbool HM, Tayeh BA, Garcez de Azevedo AR, Abutaleb A, Hussain Q. Production of geopolymer concrete by utilizing volcanic pumice dust. Vol. 16, Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022. p. e00802.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.