×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

INFLUENCE AND PREDICTION OF SINTERED AGGREGATE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LIGHTWEIGHT ALKALI-ACTIVATED CONCRETE

By
Pushpendra Singh Palash ,
Pushpendra Singh Palash

MANIT-Bhopal India

Priyanka Dhurvey Orcid logo
Priyanka Dhurvey

MANIT-Bhopal India

Abstract

The most effective method for mitigating the adverse environmental impacts of traditional concrete involves substituting cement and natural aggregate with waste and byproduct resources. Utilizing sintered lightweight aggregate (fly ash) in geopolymer concrete emerges as an efficient solution for managing and disposing of significant amounts of fly ash. The influence of sintered aggregate size distribution on the performance of alkali-activated concrete, focusing on compressive strength improvement. The study employs sintered fly ash aggregate (SFA) as coarse aggregate, aiming to optimize packing density through proper particle distribution. The highest compressive strength is achieved with a mix featuring 75% 4-8mm and 25% 8-12mm SFA. Regression-based strength models are developed, exhibiting good alignment with conventional concrete models. Thin section techniques reveal enhanced aggregate-matrix interaction due to the porous structure of SFA. The study emphasizes the potential of SFA in geopolymer concrete for sustainable construction. Lightweight geopolymer concrete, owing to its lower density, significantly reduces the overall structural load.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.