×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

ANALYZING AND PRIORITIZING HEALTHCARE SERVICE PERFORMANCE IN HOSPITALS USING SERQUAL MODEL

By
Abdul Z. Hameed Orcid logo ,
Abdul Z. Hameed
Contact Abdul Z. Hameed

Abdulaziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia

R. Balamurugan Orcid logo ,
R. Balamurugan

M. Kumarasamy College of Engineering , Karur , India

Ali Rizwan Orcid logo ,
Ali Rizwan

King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia

Muhammad Atif Shahzad Orcid logo
Muhammad Atif Shahzad

Abstract

Health care is essential for both public welfare and national growth. Nevertheless, the number of hospitals has increased; patients still face many problems highlighting the need for better healthcare services. The Present study aims to analyze the quality of healthcare services in view of patients’ fulfillment and identify their requirements to provide better service in hospitals. SERVQUAL model has been applied to analyze the quality of healthcare services from 5 aspects: reliability, assurance, physicality, empathy, and approachability. Data were collected from 300 patients belonging to 30 hospitals in Jeddah. IBM/ Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) was utilized the investigation of patients’ satisfaction with hospital services. The questionnaire validation was done through SPSS. Analysis revealed that the total effects of reliability and responsibility on patients’ satisfaction were 0.550 and 0.160, while the effects of patients’ loyalty were found to be 0.666. However, the indirect effects of reliability and responsiveness on patients’ loyalty were 0.366 and 0.160. Moreover, physician’s empathy, assurance, and tangibility toward patients significantly affected their satisfaction. Management of hospitals can improve healthcare services by focusing on responsiveness, and reliability factors, which in turn affect the loyalty and satisfaction of patients. The research reviewed with the implementation of FMEA in further research evidenced the reliability and responsiveness critical dimensions in the healthcare sector and hospitals take necessary steps to enhance the quality of service focusing on reliability and responsiveness. Risk Priority Number calculation helped to find the lagging services in the healthcare sector.

References

1.
Ahmed SM, Hossain MA. Knowledge and practice of unqualified and semi-qualified allopathic providers in rural Bangladesh: Implications for the HRH problem. Health Policy. 2007;84(2–3):332–43.
2.
Al-Dosari MN, Abdellatif MS. The environmental awareness level among Saudi women and its relationship to sustainable thinking. Acta Innovations. 2024;52:28–42.
3.
Ashley L, Armitage G. Failure mode and effects analysis: an empirical comparison of failure mode scoring procedures. Journal of Patient Safety. 2010;6(4):210–5.
4.
Nishanth R, Soundar S. Hotel Central Reservation System Using Cloud Computing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology. 2022;13(2):21–5.
5.
Brahamsen HB, Abrahamsen EB, Høyland S. On the need for revising healthcare failure mode and effect analysis for assessing potential for patient harm in healthcare processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2016;155:160–8.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

2

Crossref Logo

Akenarin Chocknakawaro, Theeranuch Pusaksrikit

(2025)

Healthcare service quality, satisfaction and loyalty in university hospitals: the moderating effects of age and visit frequency

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, ()

10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2024-0114

Crossref Logo

Lukeshwari Sahu, Pranjali Verma

(2025)

Longitudinal analysis of post-transplant electrolyte disorders and their impact on graft survival

KIDNEYS, 14(4)

10.65327/kidneys.v14i4.560

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.