×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DIGITAL VERSION OF THE MODIFIED STANDARDIZED NINE HOLE PEG TEST WITH AN AUTOTIMER

By
D. Mythili Orcid logo ,
D. Mythili

Principal, Madha College of Physiotherapy (Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University), Kundrathur, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. India

K. Narayanasamy Orcid logo ,
K. Narayanasamy

Vice Chancellor, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. India

V. Balchandar Orcid logo ,
V. Balchandar

Principal, Jaya College of Paramedical Sciences, College of Physiotherapy, (Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University), Thiruninravur, Tamil Nadu, India. India

K. Kotteeswaran Orcid logo ,
K. Kotteeswaran

Professor, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Tamil Nadu, India. India

S. Kalpana Orcid logo
S. Kalpana

Research Head, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. India

Abstract

Objective: Manual dexterity is the capacity to move the fingers and hands in a coordinated way to grasp and manipulate things. It depends on the interaction of musculoskeletal and neurological systems to make precise and intentional motions. The study's main goal is to compare the traditional Nine Hole Peg Test with a stopwatch with the dmS-NHPT with an autotimer in terms of concurrent validity, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability. Methodology: Eighty healthy adults were included and randomized into two groups. Group A was tested by Evaluator I with the dmS-NHPT, with an autotimer (digital version of the modified standardized Nine Hole Peg Test), and then with the tNHPT with a stopwatch (traditional Nine Hole Peg Test) on the same day. Group B was tested by Evaluator II. Ten days after the first testing, the second testing is done with the evaluators being reversed. Results: The mean age of participants was 36.14 ± 1.027 years. Concurrent validity between tNHPT and dmS-NHPT with an autotimer was strong by Pearson correlation (r = 0.9603, p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman LoA are used to analyze the pairs of observations between the tNHPT and dmS-NHPT with an autotimer. A scatter plot is used to display the variability between these pairs, and the mean difference is 0.82 seconds. Test-retest reliability after 10 days shows significant correlation with a coefficient of ICC = 0.983 (p = 3.3; < 0.05), and inter-rater reliability was significant with ICC = 0.987 (p = 3.16; < 0.05). Novelty: The digital auto timer and battery are incorporated within the pegboard, with the detector sensor placed within the hole of the board. The material of the pegboard is made of PLA, a bioplastic that is lightweight, which gives tactile feedback and makes gripping of the pegs easier for the subjects. The pegs are colored (visual feedback). The scores are displayed immediately at the end of placing the last peg into the hole (knowledge of results and feedback). Conclusion: The dmS-NHPT with an autotimer’s relative reliability and measurement errors are improved by spatial strategy, thereby increasing the degrees of freedom by biofeedback techniques. A valid tool to measure dexterity for healthy individuals and also patients with neurological disorders.

References

1.
India. Patent Application Number at Intellectual Property India, Patents/Designs and Trademarks, Government of India 202441052629.
2.
Sobinov AR, Bensmaia SJ. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2021;22(12):741–57.
3.
Sarasso E, Agosta F, Temporiti F, Adamo P, Piccolo F, Copetti M, et al. Brain motor functional changes after somatosensory discrimination training. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2017;12(4):1011–21.
4.
Bonzano L, Biggio M, Brigadoi S, Pedullà L, Pagliai M, Iester C, et al. Don’t plan, just do it: Cognitive and sensorimotor contributions to manual dexterity. NeuroImage. 2023;280:120348.
5.
Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, Iversen I, Cummings R. Hand strength and dexterity. The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 1971;(2):77–83.
6.
Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2003;57(5):570–3.
7.
Johansson GM, Häger CK. A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2019;16(1).
8.
Jiang X, McGinley M, Johnston J, Alberts J, Bermel R, Ontaneda D, et al. A digital version of the nine-hole peg test: Speed may be a more reliable measure of upper-limb disability than completion time in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2024;31(1):81–92.
9.
Setiawan T, Juniani A, Purnomo D, Rinanto N, Faruq H. How to Utilize Autodesk Fusion 360 that Reinforces Product Redesign Simulation? JISO: Journal of Industrial and Systems Optimization. 2023;(1):48–54.
10.
Wang Y, Lin Y, Zhong RY, Xu X. IoT-enabled cloud-based additive manufacturing platform to support rapid product development. International Journal of Production Research. 2018;57(12):3975–91.
11.
Yang Z, Yin G, Sun S, Xu P. Medical applications and prospects of polylactic acid materials. Iscience. 2024;(12).
12.
Yüksel C. The Use of Neodymium Magnets in Healthcare and Their Effects on Health. Northern Clinics of Istanbul. 2017;
13.
Nife NI, Mahmood ZK, Hammood L, Ghazi A, Aldawoodi A, Albdairi M. Self-Supervised Learning Approach for Early Detection of Rare  Neurological Disorders in MRI Data. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security. 2025;15(1):153–69.
14.
Lin CC, Tsai MC. 3D magnetic flux density measurement with reduced sampling and high accuracy using visual localization and adaptive mesh generation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023;130(5–6):2985–98.
15.
Hosseinzadeh J, Savadi A. New parallel algorithm to frequent item set mining based on bit matrix in the form of bilateral process. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2016;(1):201–7.
16.
Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):435–40.
17.
Sio A. Integration of embedded systems in healthcare monitoring: Challenges and opportunities. SCCTS Journal of Embedded Systems Design and Applications. 2025;(2):9–20.
18.
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016;15(2):155–63.
19.
Mohameed H, Muthazhagu M, Punitha K, Anvarovna AS, Rajendren DJ, Sachdeva L. Interdisciplinary Information Systems for Health and Education Libraries. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2025;15(2):11–5.
20.
Gerke O. Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews. Diagnostics. 2020;10(5):334.
21.
Riadhusin R. Ubiquitous Health Monitoring Using Bio-Wearable Devices. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications. 2025;16(3).
22.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86(2):420–8.
23.
Chakma K. Flexible and wearable electronics: Innovations challenges and future prospects. Progress in Electronic and Communication Engineering. 2025;(2):41–6.
24.
Watanabe N, Otaka Y, Kumagai M, Kondo K, Shimizu E. Reliability of the Modified Nine Hole Peg Test in Healthy Adults and          Individuals with Hemiparetic Stroke. Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022;7:n/a.
25.
Smith YA, Hong E, Presson C. Normative and Validation Studies of the Nine-Hole Peg Test with Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2000;90(3):823–43.
26.
Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 1985;5(1):24–38.
27.
Feys P, Lamers I, Francis G, Benedict R, Phillips G, LaRocca N, et al. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2017;23(5):711–20.
28.
Mythili D. Modified Standardized Nine-Hole Peg Test with Autotimer. Indian Patent 202441052629. Intellectual Property India, Patents/Designs and Trademarks, Government of India. 6AD;
29.
Zhou T, Cai J, Zhu X. An Advanced Hall Element Array-Based Device for High-Resolution Magnetic Field Mapping. Sensors. 2024;24(12):3773.
30.
Fezari M, Dahoud A, A. Integrated development environment “IDE” for Arduino. WSN applications. 2018;1–2.
31.
Martin Bland J, Altman DouglasG. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT. The Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–10.
32.
Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica. 2015;25(2):141–51.
33.
Tobler-Ammann BC, de Bruin ED, Fluet MC, Lambercy O, de Bie RA, Knols RH. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2016;13(1).
34.
Jobbágy Á, Marik AR, Fazekas G. Quantification of the Upper Extremity Motor Functions of Stroke Patients Using a Smart Nine-Hole Peg Tester. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2018;2018:1–9.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.