×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE CONSUMPTION RATE OF IRAQI CITIZENS FROM LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION IN 2024 (EXCLUDING THE KURDISTAN REGION)

By
Majid Abed Hamza Orcid logo ,
Majid Abed Hamza

University of Anbar Republic of Iraq , Ramadi , Iraq

Isam Abdul Khudhur Saud Orcid logo ,
Isam Abdul Khudhur Saud

University of Mustansiriyah , Baghdad , Iraq

Raad Idan Obaid Orcid logo
Raad Idan Obaid

Mustansiriya University Iraq

Abstract

Food security priorities in the nations focus on elements of production of fishes and animals which are crucial elements in the food chains of life. Other countries of the world make every effort to secure the availability of these goods to their citizens and this is achieved by either manufacturing them locally, or in cases where they have no capacity to do so, they go to imports. They are necessary so as to satisfy the protein requirements of the body and can also be viewed as valuable indicators of the development and livelihood of society. The quantity of animal protein that is consumed by each individual in Iraq remains significantly below that of the rich countries and even in some countries that are neighbours. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, a daily intake of at least 35 grams and not more than 80 grams of net animal protein is required and the average daily intake in Iraq was close to 20 grams, as of 2024. The research addresses a serious issue: despite the evident increase in the level of incomes and consumer purchases, the importation of red and white meat, eggs, dairy products, and powdered milk has increased, the real consumption of animal products remains lower than the minimum threshold, recommended by the WHO, although the growth rates are very high. The primary aim of this research is to explore ways of fulfilling minimum net protein requirement of animals to be included in the development plan (2023 2027). Key findings indicate that the minimum level of intake that is recommended by the WHO should be implemented at a national standard as soon as possible. In order to bridge the gap in supply and to become self-sufficient, the report also recommends the establishment of a holistic agricultural economic policy that would ensure the personal food security and the investment in the animal production industry. The findings of the research must be used to ensure that, planners and policymakers come up with agricultural policies that will improve on the flow, availability, and stability of food commodities, thus improving on industrial, economic, and nutritional outcomes. The reason is that these are products that are of strategic importance to the consumption of households as well as in other economic activities on a larger scale.

References

1.
Hayder, Mohammed, Ali. Time Series Models to Forecast Barley Crop Production in The Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Academic Journal of International University of Erbil. 2025;
2.
Al-Rubaye SA, Price EC. The Economic Impacts of Using Renewable Energy Technologies for Irrigation Water Pumping and Nanoparticle Fertilizers on Agri-Food Production in Iraq. Sustainability. 2023;15(6):5478.
3.
Savita S, Chandna M, Vijay B, Kaushik N, Kamalesh MD, Jena SK, et al. Human-computer interaction for aquatic animal tracking and monitoring water quality parameters. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies. 2025;5(1).
4.
Nayyef S, Ahmed A, Mohammed M. The Effect of Governmental Expenditure in The Agricultural Production in Iraq 1990-2020/Economic Analysis):(The Effect of Governmental Expenditure in The Agricultural Domestic Production in Iraq 1990-2020/Economic Analysis). Iraqi Journal of Market Research and Consumer Protection. 2024;(2):65–76.
5.
Alhassany H, Abbas S, Tostado-Véliz M, Vera D, Kamel S, Jurado F. Review of Bioenergy Potential from the Agriculture Sector in Iraq. Energies. 2022;15(7):2678.
6.
M. Al-kuhla AliAbdalwahab. The Role of Biotechnology in Animal Nutrition. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2025;10(2):540–51.
7.
Joint F. Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Animal Production and Health Newsletter. (77).
8.
Mageed A, Jabra U. Prediction quantities of available of capita consumption of red meat, chicken and fish in Iraq for period 2012-2022 through using box-jenkins methodology. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;(4):998–1012.
9.
Villarino MaEJ, Buenaseda Tejada MG, Patterson SE. From agricultural statistics to zero hunger: How the 50x2030 Initiative is closing data gaps for SDG2 and beyond. Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics. 2022;38(1):63–73.
10.
Ardakani Z, Aragrande M, Canali M. Global antimicrobial use in livestock farming: an estimate for cattle, chickens, and pigs. animal. 2024;18(2):101060.
11.
Mosaad MH, Ismail KK, Tamam ZM. PRINCIPLES OF DIVIDING PLANNING REGIONS IN THE LIGHT OF NATIONAL PROJECTS. Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector. 2024;19(72):1–26.
12.
Hashim BM, Alnaemi ANA, Sultan MA, Alraheem EA, Abduljabbar SA, Halder B, et al. Impact of climate change on land use and relationship with land surface temperature: representative case study in Iraq. Acta Geophysica. 2025;73(3):3025–43.
13.
Saleem M, Iqbal J, Shi Z, Garrett SH, Shah MH. Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Essential and Toxic Metals in Tissues of Thaila (Catla catla) from a Natural Lake, Pakistan and Its Possible Health Impact on Consumers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022;10(7):933.
14.
Ahmad H. Marketing Margin of Locally Produced Milk Cows in the Province of Baghdad/District Abu-Ghraib for Productive Season. 2015;
15.
Abdalla NR, Bavorova M, Gruener S. Meat Consumption in Transition: The Case of Crisis Region of Iraqi Kurdistan. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing. 2021;35(1):45–65.
16.
Nosratabadi S. The Future of Food Supply in the Middle East: Case Studies of Iran, Turkey, and Iraq. Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences;
17.
Sh AJ, Almudhafar S, Almayahi B. Desertification And Its Impact On Agricultural Production In Iraq. Library of Progress-Library Science. 2024;(3).
18.
I. Obaid R, A. Hamza M, I. Rahim F. AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE TOMATO GROWING INDUSTRY IN THE BAGHDAD GOVERNORATE FOR 2022. ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES. 2024;0–0.
19.
Report of the seventeenth meeting of the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Neglected Tropical Diseases. :11–2.
20.
Khyade V, Khyade V, Khyade S. The Baramati Quotient for the accuracy in calculation of Km value for Enzyme Kinetics. International Academic Journal of Innovative Research. 2017;(1):1–22.
21.
Qasim S. Agriculture in Iraq. InThe geography of Iraq. 2024;117–43.
22.
Veerappan S. Model-Based Assessment of Photosynthetic Efficiency and Forage Nutritional Dynamics for Sustainable Livestock Feed Systems. National Journal of Animal Health and Sustainable Livestock. 2024;(2):1–1.
23.
Biro R. Agriculture Employment and Economic Growth in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. InResource Management Performance: A Sectoral Analysis in the Post-Conflict Kurdistan Region of Iraq. 2024;417–37.
24.
Nilsson M, Ndaye M. Global Marketing and Optimization of Sustainable Food Products Utilizing Blockchain Technology. Global Perspectives in Management. 2025;(4):1–5.
25.
Ndaka FE. A Comprehensive Survey on the Natural Resources of Iraq: Insight into Possible Regional Development. Knowledge-Based Engineering and Sciences. 2025;6(1):38–63.
26.
Raghu N, Geetha Bhavani A, Kapila I, Patil S. Analyzing the Relationship between Microbial Abundance and Enzyme Activity in Dairy Milk for Quality Assessment. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2025;10(1):268–78.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.