×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

TEMPORAL PROPAGATION MODELS FOR SMART CONTRACT TRIGGERS IN BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED SAP INVOICING SYSTEMS

By
Nagendra Harish Jamithireddy Orcid logo
Nagendra Harish Jamithireddy

Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas , Richardson, Texas , United States

Abstract

Researchers have begun coupling SAP invoicing engines with blockchain smart contracts to automate document flows and provide an audit trail that cannot be tampered with. Still, a nagging obstacle is the mismatch between the timestamps SAP assigns to events and the moments when those same events are registered on a blockchain. In an effort to quantify that problem, the authors built a simulation that models how a single SAP invoice ripples through a network of blockchain nodes. The testbed pushes synthetic invoices through the link while deliberately mixing latencies, clock drifts, and inter-trigger gaps. Once enough invoices stream in, the run logs whether downstream ledgers see duplicate triggers, leak missed calls, or spit out entries in the wrong order. Results show that even a modest gap in clock ticks can distort the sequence of actions taken on paper. A second batch of runs varies the consensus scheme, toggling between PoA, PBFT, and Raft in otherwise identical topologies. Configurations that rely on deterministic agreements like PBFT produce a final view that settles quickly, while their asynchronous cousins drag through longer recovery windows. Taken together, the numbers point to design choices that keep SAP-blockchain links from unraveling the minute invoices peak.

References

1.
Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M. Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE access. 2016 May 10;4:2292-303.
2.
Pureswaran V, Brody P. Device democracy: Saving the future of the Internet of Things. IBM Corporation. 2015 Jul;23.
3.
Xu X, Weber I, Staples M. Architecture for blockchain applications.2019.
4.
Sousa J, Bessani A, Vukolic M. A byzantine fault-tolerant ordering service for the hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. In2018 48th annual IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks (DSN) 2018 Jun 25 ; 51-58. IEEE.
5.
Rimba P, Tran AB, Weber I, Staples M, Ponomarev A, Xu X. Comparing blockchain and cloud services for business process execution. In2017 IEEE international conference on software architecture (ICSA) 2017 Apr 3;257-260. IEEE. .
6.
Zhang Y, Kasahara S, Shen Y, Jiang X, Wan J. Smart contract-based access control for the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2018 Jun 15;6(2):1594-605.
7.
Wang W, Hoang DT, Hu P, Xiong Z, Niyato D, Wang P, Wen Y, Kim DI. A survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks. Ieee Access. 2019 Jan 30;7:22328-70.
8.
Emani S, Vandrangi SK, Velidi G, Ahmadi MH, Cárdenas Escorcia Y, Jafet Nieto Pisciotti A. Effects of wavy structure, ambient conditions and solar intensities on flow and temperature distributions in a mini solar flat plate collector using computational fluid dynamics. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 2023 Dec 31;17(1):2236179.
9.
Sappa A. Transformer-Based Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Event Sequence Prediction in Industrial Monitoring Systems. Journal Of Intelligent Systems with Applications. 2026 Jan 26:1-1.
10.
Atzei N, Bartoletti M, Cimoli T. A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok). InInternational conference on principles of security and trust 2017 Mar 28 (pp. 164-186). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
11.
Gervais A, Karame GO, Wüst K, Glykantzis V, Ritzdorf H, Capkun S. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security 2016 Oct 24;pp. 3-16.
12.
Keshireddy SR. Blockchain-based reconciliation and financial compliance framework for SAP S/4HANA in multistakeholder supply chains. Journal Of Intelligent Systems with Applications. 2026 Jan 26:1-2.
13.
Ren Z, Liu S, A Y, Li Y, Wu N. A blockchain-based data storage architecture for Internet of Vehicles: Delayaware consensus and data query algorithms. Vehicular Communications. 2024 Jun 1;47:100772.
14.
Bhargavan K, Delignat-Lavaud A, Fournet C, Gollamudi A, Gonthier G, Kobeissi N, Kulatova N, Rastogi A, Sibut-Pinote T, Swamy N, Zanella-Béguelin S. Formal verification of smart contracts: Short paper. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM workshop on programming languages and analysis for security 2016 Oct 24 ;91-96.
15.
Antonopoulos AM, Wood G. Mastering ethereum: building smart contracts and dapps. O’reilly Media; 2018 Nov 13.
16.
Ravi VK, Jampani S. Blockchain integration in SAP for supply chain transparency. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 2024 Nov 15;4(6):10-55544.
17.
McCorry P, Shahandashti SF, Hao F. A smart contract for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy. InInternational conference on financial cryptography and data security 2017 Apr 3 ; 357-375. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.