Purpose: The study aims to establish the connection between green entrepreneurship variables, environmental management, green technologies, green commitment of individuals, and the environmentally sustainable workforce, and the performance of internationalization of the SME in China. It further examines the mediating position of eco-innovation and the moderating position of the government support program in this connection. Theoretical Framework: The research hypothesizes the performance of internationalization as the dependent variable, and the variables of green entrepreneurship as the independent variables. The mediator is eco-innovation, whereas the government support programs moderate the connection between eco-innovation and the performance of internationalization. The model is anchored on the Resource-based View (RBV). Methodology: The quantitative research design is applied, and the data is gathered by means of a self-administered questionnaire that will be distributed among manufacturing SMEs engaged in export business in Shanxi province, China. Findings: The research paper identifies the importance of green entrepreneurship factors in promoting the internationalization performance of SMEs. Strong contributors to internationalization are environmental management (coefficient = 0.325, p < 0.01) and green technologies (coefficient = 0.418, p < 0.01). The individual green commitment (coefficient = 0.267, p < 0.05) also has a positive influence on internationalization, and this interaction is mediated by eco-innovation (coefficient = 0.415, p < 0.001). The indirect effect of the environmentally sustainable workforce (coefficient = 0.193, p = 0.053) on the internationalization performance is also marginal. Research Implication: The results provide a significant implication to the SMEs and the policy makers, since it is clear that green entrepreneurship practices should be integrated to promote internationalization. Eco-innovation is a key factor in enhancing competitiveness, and such initiatives can be enhanced by the government. Originality/Value: The study adds to the discussion of how the factors of green entrepreneurship and eco-innovation can lead to the internationalization performance in SMEs, which present the opportunity to achieve sustainable growth and competitiveness on the global level.
Abdi M, Aulakh PS. Internationalization and performance: Degree, duration, and scale of operations. Journal of International Business Studies. 2018;49(7):832–57.
2.
Baah C, Opoku-Agyeman D, Acquah ISK, Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Afum E, Faibil D, et al. Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021;27:100–14.
3.
Calheiros-Lobo N, Vasconcelos Ferreira J, Au-Yong-Oliveira M. SME Internationalization and Export Performance: A Systematic Review with Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8473.
4.
Cao J, Ho MS, Hu W, Jorgenson D. Effective labor supply and growth outlook in China. China Economic Review. 2020;61:101398.
5.
Freeman RE, Dmytriyev SD, Phillips RA. Stakeholder Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management. 2021;47(7):1757–70.
6.
Gupta M, Dharwal M. Green entrepreneurship and sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;49:3603–6.
7.
Khan SAR, Ahmad Z, Sheikh AA, Yu Z. Green technology adoption paving the way toward sustainable performance in circular economy: a case of Pakistani small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2023;16(5):801–22.
8.
Kiefer CP, del Río P, Carrillo‐Hermosilla J. On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(4):1531–47.
9.
Lv C, Shao C, Lee CC. Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Economics. 2021;98:105237.
10.
Mady K, Battour M, Aboelmaged M, Abdelkareem RS. Linking internal environmental capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage in manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;417:137928.
11.
Makhloufi L, Laghouag AA, Meirun T, Belaid F. Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource‐based view and environmental policy perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;31(1):425–44.
12.
Nakku VB, Agbola FW, Miles MP, Mahmood A. The interrelationship between SME government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy perspective. Journal of Small Business Management. 2019;58(1):2–31.
13.
Olubusola Odeyemi, Favour Oluwadamilare Usman, Noluthando Zamanjomane Mhlongo, Oluwafunmi Adijat Elufioye, Chinedu Ugochukwu Ike. Sustainable entrepreneurship: A review of green business practices and environmental impact. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2023;21(2):346–58.
14.
Qiu L, Jie X, Wang Y, Zhao M. Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019;27(1):146–65.
15.
Ryu D, Baek KH, Yoon J. Open Innovation with Relational Capital, Technological Innovation Capital, and International Performance in SMEs. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3418.
16.
Sadiq M, Leong MK, Salim AS, Jiayao Z. Fostering entrepreneurial success through the predictive role of knowledge management, green creativity, green social behavior, dynamic capabilities, business environment and green service innovation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2025;21(1).
17.
Safari A, Saleh AS, Balicevac Al Ismail V. Enhancing the export activities of small and medium-sized enterprises in emerging markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2021;37(5):1150–66.
18.
Seroka‐Stolka O, Fijorek K. Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Proactive environmental strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of firm size. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(6):2338–54.
19.
Tekala K, Baradarani S, Alzubi A, Berberoğlu A. Green Entrepreneurship for Business Sustainability: Do Environmental Dynamism and Green Structural Capital Matter? Sustainability. 2024;16(13):5291.
20.
Thake AM. Transitioning to a green economy - the impact on the labor market and workforce skills. Greening Our Economy for a Sustainable Future. Elsevier; 2025. p. 163–75.
21.
Wang J, Duan K, Zheng Y. Green supply chain management, green technology innovation and firms’ energy consumption intensity. Energy Economics. 2025;141:108133.
22.
Wang L, Long Y, Li C. Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022;322:116127.
23.
Wang M, Li Y, Li J, Wang Z. Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;297:113282.
24.
Xu G, Wang Y, Wang L, Zhou Y. How do competition and collaboration promote green technology diffusion? Evidence from the global hydropower industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;478:143890.
25.
Zulu-Chisanga S, Chabala M, Mandawa-Bray B. The differential effects of government support, inter-firm collaboration and firm resources on SME performance in a developing economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2020;13(2):175–95.
26.
Gerschewski S, Rose EL, Lindsay VJ. Understanding the drivers of international performance for born global firms: An integrated perspective. Journal of World Business. 2015;50(3):558–75.
27.
Lee E, Jo SH, Jeong H. Environmental management in small and medium enterprises: the role of customer orientation and firm performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2019;34(8):1779–90.
28.
Raineri N, Paillé P. Linking Corporate Policy and Supervisory Support with Environmental Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Employee Environmental Beliefs and Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015;137(1):129–48.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
