×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

CROSS-LEDGER STATE PROPAGATION AND CONVERGENCE MODELING FOR SAP FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OVER BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURES

By
Naren Swamy Jamithireddy Orcid logo
Naren Swamy Jamithireddy

Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas United States

Abstract

Financial reporting within enterprise resource planning now commonly rides on a blockchain backbone, yet the problem of keeping each distributed ledger in sync remains stubbornly difficult-especially when SAP modules are at the controls. This paper describes a simulation-based testbed that watches SAP payment journals as they hop between differently configured blockchains, measuring how and when each copy reaches the same state. By replaying typical SAP routines under adjustable delay windows and choice of consensus rules, the model tallies the frequency of divergence, the lag before agreement, and the mechanics of clearing up disputes. Output files display convex 3D surfaces, animated heat maps, and step-by-step trails of how conflicts get settled; taken together, they point middleware designers toward tighter sync logic, smarter contract frameworks, and faster multi-ledger audits. In broader terms, the findings shrink the technical distance SAP users must traverse to achieve clean, traceable cross-chain accounting.

References

1.
Swan M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.; 2015 Jan 24.
2.
Iansiti M, Lakhani KR. The truth about blockchain. Harvard business review. 2017 Jan 1;95(1):118-27. 2017;
3.
Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S, Park S, Smolander K. Where is current research on blockchain technology?— a systematic review. PloS one. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0163477. 2016;
4.
Ravi VK, Jampani S. Blockchain integration in SAP for supply chain transparency. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 2024 Nov 15;4(6):10-55544. 2024;
5.
Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress) 2017 Jun 25 (pp. 557- 564). Ieee. . 2017;
6.
Casino F, Dasaklis TK, Patsakis C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and informatics. 2019 Mar 1;36:55-81. 2019;
7.
Vandrangi SK, Emani S, Sharma KV, Velidi G. Friction factor analysis of SiO2 and Al2O3 nanofluids dispersed in 60 egw and 40 egw base fluids. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2018;51(1):61-70. 2018;
8.
Tian F. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM) 2016 Jun 24 (pp. 1-6). IEEE. 2016;
9.
Wang W, Hoang DT, Hu P, Xiong Z, Niyato D, Wang P, Wen Y, Kim DI. A survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks. Ieee Access. 2019 Jan 30;7:22328-70. . 2019;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.