×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CALCULATION OF GEOLOGICAL RESERVES OBTAINED BY MANUAL METHOD OF GEOLOGICAL BLOCKS AND CALCULATIONS BYMODERN SOFTWARE

By
Nermin Taletović ,
Nermin Taletović
Contact Nermin Taletović

Mining Institute Tuzla , Tuzla , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dean Osmanović ,
Dean Osmanović

Mining Institute Tuzla , Tuzla , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jasmin Isabegović
Jasmin Isabegović

Mining Institute Tuzla , Tuzla , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the calculation of coal reserves obtained by classical method (calculation method of geological blocks), which were compared with the results obtained by the calculation using software. Since this area was explored for long period of time and elaborates were done in past, we came to an idea to compare results from Elaborate with results obtained through software supported analysis of deposit. The compared results indicate that the results gain through classical calculation and through use of software vary within the permissible tolerances for this kind of calculation.

References

1.
Musić OkG, Osmanovic D. Defining the Coal Layer (Block 61) 3D Model in Brown Coal Mine Đurđevik.(Scientific work, Univerzitet u Tuzli. In: RGGF, BH 23rd International Mining Congress & Exhibition of Turkey • 16-19 April 2013 ANTALYA. 2013.
2.
The Geology of Central Europe: Mesozoic and Cenozoic Tom McCann , Book. 2008.
3.
Basic geological map Zenica 1:100.000.
4.
Official Gazette Federation of BiH "Regulations of geological research. 2010;
5.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.