×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

NEXT-GEN PHYSICS EDUCATION: AR/VR-POWERED SIMPLE PENDULUM LEARNING FOR OBE AND NEP 2020

By
Alex Mathew Orcid logo ,
Alex Mathew

Division of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences (Deemed to be University), , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu , India

K. Martin Sagayam Orcid logo ,
K. Martin Sagayam

Division of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM TRP Engineering college , Trichy, Tamil Nadu , India

J. Samson Immanuel Orcid logo ,
J. Samson Immanuel

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu , India

P. Esther Jebarani Orcid logo
P. Esther Jebarani

Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu , India

Abstract

The rapid advancement of immersive technologies has opened new possibilities for enhancing physics education through virtual learning environments. This study presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of an AR/VR-based Simple Pendulum virtual laboratory developed using the Unity platform to support Outcome-Based Education (OBE) under the NEP 2020 framework. The experimental dataset comprised interaction and assessment data from 100 undergraduate students representing diverse academic backgrounds. The effectiveness of learning was measured through pre- and post-test assessments, as well as the analysis of Program Outcome (PO) achievement in cognitive, psychomotor, and affective areas. The findings show a marked positive impact on learning outcomes of students through VR intervention, where the percentage of conceptual understanding, skill development, and engagement and motivation improved from 62% to 80% (+18%), 55% to 78% (+23%), and 58% to 82% (+24%), respectively. The scores of PO achievement also showed a marked improvement, where PO1 (Conceptual Knowledge) improved from 2.2 to 2.8, PO2 (Skill Application) achieved the highest score of 3.0, and PO3 (Innovation and Problem Solving) showed an improvement of 0.7 points on a 3-point scale. The virtual pendulum experiment resulted in an average value of gravitational acceleration of 9.85 m/s², which is in close agreement with the standard value, thus confirming the instructional correctness of the simulation. The results clearly show that AR/VR-based virtual laboratories have a significant positive impact on learning effectiveness, digital literacy, and outcome achievement, thus justifying their adoption in modern physics education.

References

1.
Al-Ansi AM, Jaboob M, Garad A, Al-Ansi A. Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023 Jan 1;8(1):100532.
2.
Nesenbergs K, Abolins V, Ormanis J, Mednis A. Use of augmented and virtual reality in remote higher education: A systematic umbrella review. Education Sciences. 2020 Dec 31;11(1):1-12.
3.
Childs E, Mohammad F, Stevens L, Burbelo H, Awoke A, Rewkowski N, Manocha D. An overview of enhancing distance learning through emerging augmented and virtual reality technologies. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2023 Apr 10;30(8):4480-96.
4.
Ardiny H, Khanmirza E. The role of AR and VR technologies in education developments: opportunities and challenges. In2018 6th rsi international conference on robotics and mechatronics (icrom) 2018 Oct 23 (pp. 482-487). IEEE.
5.
Mathew A, Sagayam KM, Chacko A. Investigation on contribution of AR and VR involved in remote education. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications. 2025;16(2):690-706.
6.
Ahmed KG. Augmented reality in remote learning: a proposed transformative approach for building construction education. In2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf) 2020 Dec 6 (pp. 115- 120). IEEE.
7.
Sanfilippo F, Blazauskas T, Salvietti G, Ramos I, Vert S, Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Oliveira D. A perspective review on integrating VR/AR with haptics into STEM education for multi-sensory learning. Robotics. 2022 Mar 31;11(2):1.
8.
Kalluri K, Kokala A, Kodakandla N, Parvatha N, Gundugolanu H. Transforming Education: Exploring the Potential of VR and AR in Online Learning Systems. Available at SSRN 5204089. 2025 Mar 27.
9.
Raja M, Lakshmi Priya GG. Using virtual reality and augmented reality with ICT tools for enhancing quality in the changing academic environment in COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study. InTechnologies, artificial intelligence and the future of learning post-COVID-19: The crucial role of international accreditation 2022 Feb 17 (pp. 467-482). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
10.
de Moraes Rossetto AG, Martins TC, Silva LA, Leithardt DR, Bermejo‐Gil BM, Leithardt VR. An analysis of the use of augmented reality and virtual reality as educational resources. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2023 Nov;31(6):1761-75.
11.
Li P, Fang Z, Jiang T. Research into improved distance learning using VR technology. InFrontiers in Education 2022 Feb 11 (Vol. 7, p. 757874). Frontiers Media SA.
12.
Effendi H, Hendriyani Y, Humaira JD. The Future of E-Learning: Leveraging VR, AR, and AI for more effective and engaging learning experiences. InProceedings of Vocational Engineering International Conference 2023 (Vol. 5, pp. 244-251).
13.
Shevchuk I, Filippova L, Krasnova A, Bazyl O. Virtual Pedagogy: Scenarios for Future Learning with VR and AR Technologies. Futurity Education. 2023 Nov 5;3(4):95-117.
14.
Sosnilo AV, Kreer MY, Petrova VV. AR/VR technologies in management and education. Управление. 2021;9(2):114-24.
15.
Bermejo B, Juiz C, Cortes D, Oskam J, Moilanen T, Loijas J, Govender P, Hussey J, Schmidt AL, Burbach R, King D. AR/VR teaching-learning experiences in higher education institutions (HEI): A systematic literature review. InInformatics 2023 May 16 (Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 45). MDPI.
16.
Zhao X, Ren Y, Cheah KS. Leading virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in education: bibliometric and content analysis from the web of science (2018–2022). Sage Open. 2023 Aug;13(3):1-23.
17.
Whitley-Walters D, Muhammad J. The analysis of implementing augmented reality within remote learning. InADMI 2021: The Symposium of Computing at Minority Institutions 2021 Jan. 1-7.
18.
Pratama GN, Triyono MB, Hasanah N, Kenzhaliyev OB, Kosherbayeva AN, Kassymova GK, Azman MN. Development of Construction Engineering Teaching Course by Using VR-AR: A Case Study of Polytechnic in Indonesia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2022 Jul 15;17(14).
19.
Garlinska M, Osial M, Proniewska K, Pregowska A. The influence of emerging technologies on distance education. Electronics. 2023 Mar 25;12(7):1-29.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.