×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOWN SYNDROME DETECTION SYSTEM USING ULTRA SOUND FETUS IMAGES AND DEEP LEARNING CLASSIFICATION METHODS

By
V. Gokulakrishnan Orcid logo ,
V. Gokulakrishnan

Research Scholar, Department of Computer and Science and Engineering, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University , Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu , India

S. Selvakumar Orcid logo
S. Selvakumar

Professor, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University , Samayapuram, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu , India

Abstract

Down Syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder due to a partial copy of the 21 st chromosome in the fetus, usually detected by invasive techniques like Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS) which have chances of miscarriage. This paper suggests a completely automated and computer-aided method of non-invasive detection of DS by ultrasound fetus (USF) images, as a way of overcoming the constraints of the conventional diagnostic methods. The proposed system applies Non-Sub Sampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) in transforming the image, and extracting features and classifying them using a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNET). The system was trained and tested with normal and abnormal USF images with considerable results. On the Mendeley data, the system had Fetal NT Sensitivity (FNSE) of 99.24, Fetal NT Specificity (FNSP) of 99.19, Fetal NT Accuracy (FNA) of 99.23, Fetal Positive predictive rate (FPPR) of 99.28, and Fetal Negative predictive rate (FNPR) of 99.24. In the case of Kaggle Fetus (KF) dataset, the system achieved FNSE of 99.24, FNSP of 99.33, FNA of 99.1, FPPR of 99.29, and FNPR of 99.26. Mendeley and KF datasets had the average Fetus Detection Time (FDT) of 0.51 ms and 0.46 ms, respectively. The results of this study prove that the proposed method performs better in terms of detection accuracy, sensitivity, and speed and is a promising tool to conduct early non-invasive screening of the fetus and minimize the use of invasive diagnostic methods.

References

1.
van der Meij KRM, Henneman L, Sistermans EA. Non‐invasive prenatal testing for everybody or contingent screening? Prenatal Diagnosis. 2023;43(4):443–7.
2.
Xie HN, Wang N, He M, Zhang LH, Cai HM, Xian JB, et al. Using deep‐learning algorithms to classify fetal brain ultrasound images as normal or abnormal. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;56(4):579–87.
3.
Kumar S, Selvakumar K. Various Methods for Computing Risk Factors of Down Syndrome in Fetus. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2025;(1):485–98.
4.
Ye C, Duan H, Liu M, Liu J, Xiang J, Yin Y, et al. The value of combined detailed first-trimester ultrasound-biochemical analysis for screening fetal aneuploidy in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;(2):843–53.
5.
Micucci M, Iula A. Recent Advances in Machine Learning Applied to Ultrasound Imaging. Electronics. 2022;11(11):1800.
6.
Thomas MC, Arjunan SP. Deep Learning Measurement Model to Segment the Nuchal Translucency Region for the Early Identification of Down Syndrome. Measurement Science Review. 2022;22(4):187–92.
7.
Bowden B, de Souza S, Puchades A, Williams K, Morgan S, Anderson S, et al. Implementation of non‐invasive prenatal testing within a national UK antenatal screening programme: Impact on women’s choices. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2022;42(5):549–56.
8.
Yousefpour Shahrivar R, Karami F, Karami E. Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches. Biomimetics. 2023;8(7):519.
9.
Zhang M, Gao Y, Liang M, Wang Y, Guo L, Wu D, et al. Correlation between maternal serum biomarkers and the risk of fetal chromosome copy number variants: a single-center retrospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;(2):933–42.
10.
Stallings EB, Isenburg JL, Rutkowski RE, Kirby RS, Nembhard WN, Sandidge T, et al. National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2016–2020. Birth Defects Research. 2024;116(1).
11.
Raza A, Munir K, Almutairi MS, Sehar R. Novel Transfer Learning Based Deep Features for Diagnosis of Down Syndrome in Children Using Facial Images. IEEE Access. 2024;12:16386–96.
12.
Tang J, Han J, Xue J, Zhen L, Yang X, Pan M, et al. A Deep-Learning-Based Method Can Detect Both Common and Rare Genetic Disorders in Fetal Ultrasound. Biomedicines. 2023;11(6):1756.
13.
Geppert J, Stinton C, Johnson S, Clarke A, Grammatopoulos D, Taylor‐Phillips S. Antenatal screening for fetal trisomies using microarray‐based cell‐free DNA testing: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2019;40(4):454–62.
14.
Devisri B, Kavitha M. Fetal growth analysis from ultrasound videos based on different biometrics using optimal segmentation and hybrid classifier. Statistics in Medicine. 2023;43(5):1019–47.
15.
Khan IU, Aslam N, Anis FM, Mirza S, AlOwayed A, Aljuaid RM, et al. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Classification of Amniotic Fluid Using Ultrasound Images from Saudi Arabia. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2022;6(4):107.
16.
Abdullah D. Uncertainty-Aware Representation Learning with Physical Consistency for Robust Decision Processes in Large-Scale Data Systems. Journal of Scalable Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing. 2025;9–17.
17.
Koul AM, Ahmad F, Bhat A, Aein Q ul, Ahmad A, Reshi AA, et al. Unraveling Down Syndrome: From Genetic Anomaly to Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Diagnosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11(12):3284.
18.
Reshi AA, Shafi S, Qayoom I, Wani M, Parveen S, Ahmad A. Deep Learning-Based Architecture for Down Syndrome Assessment During Early Pregnancy Using Fetal Ultrasound Images. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review. 2024;38:182–93.
19.
Alzubaidi M, Agus M, Alyafei K, Althelaya KA, Shah U, Abd-Alrazaq A, et al. Toward deep observation: A systematic survey on artificial intelligence techniques to monitor fetus via ultrasound images. iScience. 2022;25(8):104713.
20.
Selvathi D, Chandralekha R. Fetal biometric based abnormality detection during prenatal development using deep learning techniques. Multidimensional systems and signal processing. 2022;(1):1–5.
21.
Wang C, Yu L, Su J, Mahy T, Selis V, Yang C, et al. Down Syndrome detection with Swin Transformer architecture. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2023;86:105199.
22.
Liu L, Tang D, Li X, Ouyang Y. Automatic fetal ultrasound image segmentation of first trimester for measuring biometric parameters based on deep learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2024;(9):27283–304.
23.
Abdullah D. Recent advancements in nanoengineering for biomedical applications: A comprehensive review. Innovative Reviews in Engineering and Science. 2024;(1):1–5.
24.
Mengistu A, Assaye B, Flatie A, Mossie Z. Detecting microcephaly and macrocephaly from ultrasound images using artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Imaging. 2025;(1):183.
25.
Saranya S, Sudha S. Certain Mathematical Investigations on Prenatal Down Syndrome Detection using ANFIS Classification Approach. Appl Math. 2020;(1):97–104.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.