,
Faculty of Economics, Academy of Finance , Hanoi , Vietnam
,
Faculty of Economics, Academy of Finance , Hanoi , Vietnam
,
Faculty of Economics, Academy of Finance , Hanoi , Vietnam
Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, Banking Academy , Hanoi , Vietnam
The business model of the sharing economy is growing rapidly globally with the emergence of a series of sharing platforms such as Uber, Grab. The carriage of goods and passengers by transportation connection technology translation application have economic advantages and convenience for participants. Previous research on the sharing economy has largely focused on the implications of the sharing economy, the types of business models of the sharing economy and their impact. The objective of this paper is to focuse on clarifying the role of state regulators to balance social benefits in the sharing economy in the transportation sector. Database sets secondary data are collected from various sources such as the National Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam from 2015 to 2024. Primary data were collected in the period from January 2024 to December 2024, through the survey method using a semi-structured questionnaire with 917 observations, including: 464 technology drivers, 411 consumers in the field of sharing economy in the transportation sector and 42 officials working at state management agencies in charge of delivery pine. Using quantitative research, the PLS-SEM linear structure model, is implemented through SPSS and AMOS 27 software. The new findings show that the role of the State in balancing social interests in the field of transport in Vietnam is still limited. The study has been supplement theories and practices that are fundamental to promoting the sharing economy in the transportation sector in developing countries around the globe such as Vietnam.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
