×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

THE STRUCTURAL MODEL OF CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS, ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY, AND KNOWLEDGE ACCUMULATION AT KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY

By
Anwar Ali Alhadawi Orcid logo ,
Anwar Ali Alhadawi
Contact Anwar Ali Alhadawi

Researcher, Department of Information Science, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia

Mohammad Jafar Arif Orcid logo
Mohammad Jafar Arif

Professor, Department of Information Science, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Uzbekistan

Abstract

The study was to examine the direct influence of the presence of the elements of knowledge management on the preservation of knowledge accumulation, the direct influence of the elements on the utilization of the organizational memory dimensions, and the direct influence of organizational memory on the preservation of knowledge accumulation at King Abdulaziz University. It also tested the indirect effect of organizational memory as mediating variable between the elements of knowledge management and the level of knowledge accumulation at the university through structural model of causal relationships of the three variables. The researcher used the descriptive correlational technique and selected all the members of the faculty at the King Abdulaziz University, amounting to 6,911 faculty members, and 388 respondents. Data collection was done using a valid and reliable questionnaire. The Amos v24 was utilized to analyze data in order to determine causal relationships. The results showed direct and indirect impacts of knowledge management and organizational memory practice on knowledge amassing. The direct path coefficient of the knowledge management elements on the knowledge accumulation was (0.09), the direct influence of knowledge management on the organizational memory was (0.93), and the direct influence of organizational memory on the knowledge accumulation was (0.88). The indirect path coefficient of knowledge management on knowledge accumulation across the organizational memory was (0.82), denoted that it has a great indirect influence. This proves that organizational memory is an important mediating variable, which can highly increase the effects of the knowledge management practices on the knowledge accumulation in the organization. The paper suggested to establish organizational memory in the university and use the determined causal model as the means of planning and implementing the university policies as the reference framework to make administrative and scholarly choices.

References

1.
Albadawi BI, Salha MO. Role of knowledge management in ensuring quality of higher education in Al-Quds University from the academic staff’s perspective. The Arab Journal for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 2021 Apr 14;14(47):1-30.
2.
Alavi M, Leidner DE. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues1, 2. MIS quarterly. 2001 Mar 1;25(1):107-36.
3.
Al-Mashkoor RJ, Dawood DS, Ayash LM. Awareness of Chemical Innovations Among Teachers of Chemistry. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021;12(11):383-94.
4.
Al-Juhani AB. Institutional excellence in Saudi universities in light of the criteria of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA)-Tabuk University as a model. Educational Research and Innovation Journal. 2021 Oct 1;1(3):85-138.
5.
Aladwan SA, AL-Yakoub TA, Adaileh AM. Challenges of knowledge management in the public sector: evidence from the King Abdullah Award for Excellence in Jordan. The TQM Journal. 2022 Nov 29;34(6):1896-913.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.