×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

MLA: INTELLECTUAL DUAL KEY-BASED NODE AUTHENTICATION WITH MASTER LINKED AUDITOR NODE BEHAVIOUR-BASED MALICIOUS NODE DETECTION FOR SECURE DATA TRANSMISSION IN 6G ENABLED WSN

By
Pavan Vamsi Mohan Movva Orcid logo ,
Pavan Vamsi Mohan Movva
Contact Pavan Vamsi Mohan Movva

Department of computer engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Foundation, Vaddeswaram , Guntur, Andra Pradesh , India

Radhika Rani Chintala Orcid logo
Radhika Rani Chintala

Department of computer engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Foundation, Vaddeswaram , Guntur, Andra Pradesh , India

Abstract

This study focuses on the ever-increasing challenge of ensuring the integrity of Sixth Generation (6G) enabled Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), which are highly vulnerable to malicious node attacks, thereby compromising network data integrity and efficiency. Conventional methods of cryptography do not necessarily resist advanced attacks like selective forwarding, where network nodes (malicious nodes) interfere with the network by dropping, delaying, or modifying data packets. To counteract such risks, the paper proposes a new model, the Intellectual Dual Key-based Node Authentication with Master Linked Auditor (IDKNA-MLA-MND). It is a framework that combines dual-key authentication and behavior-based auditing using a Master Node and an Auditor Node to audit the entire network. The most important innovation of such an approach is the division of responsibilities between the Master Node, which takes decisions based on behavior data, and the Auditor Node, which continuously monitors node behavior indicative of a malicious action. By verifying the node's identity and eliminating impersonation, the dual-key system ensures secure data transmission. The cross-layer approach in the methodology integrates cryptographic security and behavioral auditing, making it more resilient to both insider threats and adaptive attacks. The proposed model's performance is tested through a large number of simulations, which show it to be more efficient than the current models. In particular, the IDKNA-MLA-MND framework achieved 98.5% detection accuracy for malicious nodes and required much less time to detect both malicious and benign nodes. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the model has low communication overhead and energy consumption, making it very efficient for large-scale WSN implementation. The results indicate that the model is a promising way of improving the security and reliability of WSNs in practice.

References

1.
Fu H, Liu Y, Dong Z, Wu Y. A data clustering algorithm for detecting selective forwarding attack in cluster-based wireless sensor networks. Sensors. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):23.
2.
Zhai Z, Lai G, Cheng B, Qian J, Zhao L, Wu J, Wan Z. Lightweight secure detection service for malicious attacks in wsn with timestamp-based mac. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. 2022 Jul 27;19(4):5299-311.
3.
Nouman M, Qasim U, Nasir H, Almasoud A, Imran M, Javaid N. Malicious node detection using machine learning and distributed data storage using blockchain in WSNs. IEEe Access. 2023 Jan 16;11:6106-21.
4.
Abbas S, Nasir H, Almogren A, Altameem A, Javaid N. Blockchain based privacy preserving authentication and malicious node detection in Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) networks. IEEE Access. 2022 Oct 25;10:113945-55.
5.
Pang B, Teng Z, Sun H, Du C, Li M, Zhu W. A malicious node detection strategy based on fuzzy trust model and the abc algorithm in wireless sensor network. IEEE wireless communications letters. 2021 Apr 2;10(8):1613-7.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.