×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Professional paper

REASONS TO CHANGE THE TENDER PROJECT OF A TUNNEL DURING CONSTRUCTION

By
Dragan Lukić ,
Dragan Lukić
Contact Dragan Lukić

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Subotica, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Stanko Brčić ,
Stanko Brčić

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Elefterija Zlatanović
Elefterija Zlatanović

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Nis, Niš, Serbia

Abstract

During construction, especially of tunnels, very often there is a need to change the tender technical documents, i.e. the documents upon which the construction permit is obtained and the tender is announced. The main reason for the change of documentation is, above all, unsuficient geotechnical investigations due to which technical solutions and calculations are inadequate. Very rearly documentation is changed due to errors in the calculation if the techncal review of documentation is correctly done. The paper presents an example of the change of documentation during construction and the reasons for that.

References

1.
E-80 H. Section 5a - Sarlah Tunnel –Major project of the Tunnel, Jaroslav Cerni. 2010.
2.
E-80 H. Section 5a - Sarlah Tunnel - Report on the Geotechnical Evaluation and the Final Design of the Tunnel, Jaroslav Černi. 2013.
3.
Geotechnical Evaluation of Additional Site Investigation. 2013.
4.
Đukić BD. Geotehničke klasifikacije za površinske radove u rudarstvu i građevinarstvu. 2004.
5.
Đurić N. Hidrogeološka i inženjerskogeološka istraživanja. 2011.
6.
Simić D, Z K. Osnovi mehanike stena. 1989.
7.
Stević M. Mehanika tla i stijena. 1991.
8.
Tunnel S. Entrance Portal (modifications to the revised design of thetunnels entrance portal of March 2014)”. 2014.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.