Executing many civil projects is arduous due to the many associated dangers. Risk Assessment (RA) is crucial for selecting building projects and managing construction activities. RA examines adverse events in the preparation and scheduling phases of building projects. Construction risk refers to the vulnerability to possible losses. Given the construction sector's significance to a nation's economy, it is imperative to investigate and analyze diverse risk identification and management solutions. This paper presents a methodology developed through a real-time case study to assess risk in building projects. Risk can be described as determining the probability, intensity, and exposure of all hazards related to a building phase. The research advocates for a combined approach for risk evaluation in building projects utilizing RA and the Geological Information System (GIS) for decision-making. The research identifies various hazards in building projects via the study of the literature research and the formulation of surveys. The suggested study documents the replies from diverse building projects to the specified surveys. The findings of the proposed study identify the primary hazards in building projects. The research advocates for a comprehensive spatial risk evaluation and a GIS-based approach for diverse building projects.
Hu X, Sinniah S. The Role of Green Risk Management Approaches in Promoting Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 9(2):33–54.
2.
Genc O. Identifying principal risk factors in Turkish construction sector according to their probability of occurrences: a relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. International Journal of Construction Management. 2023;23(6):979–87.
3.
Cortés-Pérez JP, Cortés-Pérez A, Prieto-Muriel P. BIM-integrated management of occupational hazards in building construction and maintenance. Automation in Construction. 2020;113:103115.
4.
Wu P, Yang L, Li W, Huang J, Xu Y. Construction Safety Risk Assessment and Early Warning of Nearshore Tunnel Based on BIM Technology. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 11(10):1996.
5.
Jafari K, Shokrzadeh A. The Investigation of Leisure and Water Center According Architecture Approach (A Case Study. Miandoab City) environment. 2013(1).
6.
In SY, Manav B, Venereau CMA, Cruz R. LE, Weyant JP. Climate-related financial risk assessment on energy infrastructure investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;167:112689.
7.
Guan L, Abbasi A, Ryan MJ. Analyzing green building project risk interdependencies using Interpretive Structural Modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;256:120372.
8.
Shibani A, Hasan D, Saaifan J, Sabboubeh H, Eltaip M, Saidani M, et al. Financial risk management in the construction projects. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 2024;36(8):552–61.
9.
Röell C, Osabutey E, Rodgers P, Arndt F, Khan Z, Tarba S. Managing socio-political risk at the subnational level: Lessons from MNE subsidiaries in Indonesia. Journal of World Business. 2022;57(3):101312.
10.
Parsamehr M, Perera US, Dodanwala TC, Perera P, Ruparathna R. A review of construction management challenges and BIM-based solutions: perspectives from the schedule, cost, quality, and safety management. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023;24(1):353–89.
11.
Parsamehr M, Perera US, Dodanwala TC, Perera P, Ruparathna R. A review of construction management challenges and BIM-based solutions: perspectives from the schedule, cost, quality, and safety management. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023;Jan;24(1):353-89.
12.
Ke GY. Managing reliable emergency logistics for hazardous materials: A two-stage robust optimization approach. Computers & Operations Research. 2022;138:105557.
13.
Schuldt SJ, Nicholson MR, Adams YA, Delorit JD. Weather-Related Construction Delays in a Changing Climate: A Systematic State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability. 13(5):2861.
14.
Deiva Ganesh A, Kalpana P. Future of artificial intelligence and its influence on supply chain risk management – A systematic review. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2022;169:108206.
15.
Shi J, Huang W, Han H, Xu C. Pollution control of wastewater from the coal chemical industry in China: Environmental management policy and technical standards. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;143:110883.
16.
Rezvani SM, Falcão MJ, Komljenovic D, de Almeida NM. A Systematic Literature Review on Urban Resilience Enabled with Asset and Disaster Risk Management Approaches and GIS-Based Decision Support Tools. Applied Sciences. 13(4):2223.
17.
Hao H, Bi K, Chen W, Pham TM, Li J. Towards next generation design of sustainable, durable, multi-hazard resistant, resilient, and smart civil engineering structures. Engineering Structures. 2023;277:115477.
18.
Pescaroli G, Velazquez O, Alcántara-Ayala I, Galasso C, Kostkova P, Alexander D. A Likert Scale-Based Model for Benchmarking Operational Capacity, Organizational Resilience, and Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2020;11(3):404–9.
19.
Anderies JM, Cumming GS, Clements HS, Lade SJ, Seppelt R, Chawla S, et al. A framework for conceptualizing and modeling social-ecological systems for conservation research. Biological Conservation. 2022;275:109769.
20.
Jepson J, Kirytopoulos K, Chileshe N. Isomorphism within risk-management practices of the Australian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management. 2022;22(8):1508–24.
21.
Osei-Asibey D, Ayarkwa J, Acheampong A, Adinyira E, Amoah P. Impacts of accidents and hazards on the Ghanaian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management. 2023;23(4):708–17.
22.
Settembre-Blundo D, González-Sánchez R, Medina-Salgado S, García-Muiña FE. Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2021;22(S2):107–32.
23.
Jain A, Babu DrKA. AN EXAMINATION OF CUTTING-EDGE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS CONCERNING GREEN ARCHITECTURE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR TIER-II CITIES OF INDIA. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2024;31(2):57–69.
24.
Regona M, Yigitcanlar T, Xia B, Li RYM. Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022;8(1):45.
25.
Khaddour LA. Life-cycle sustainability risk management a multi-stakeholder approach: the case of Damascus post-war residential projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2022;24(11):12756–86.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
