This study investigates the seismic performance of a four-story reinforced concrete frame building with irregularities, situated on sloping ground. Recognizing the increasing prevalence of construction on slopes due to population growth and urban expansion, this research employs a step-back model on the sloping terrain at inclinations of 0°, 10°, and 20°. A three-dimensional model of the rectangular building was developed and analysed using SAP2000 software, implementing pushover analysis as per ATC-40 guidelines. The analysis focuses on the impact of sloping ground on structural forces, specifically examining horizontal reactions and bending moments in columns. Preliminary findings indicate that shorter columns experience higher forces due to increased stiffness, resulting in elevated shear and bending moments. Consequently, these columns require design modifications to accommodate the amplified forces. Furthermore, the study examines key dynamic characteristics, including hinge formation, base shear, target displacement, and maximum column moments, comparing results between level and sloping ground conditions.
Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1893:2016, Part-1. . IS. 2016;
2.
Bureau of Indian Standards. Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces -Code of practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2002. (IS 13920:2002). IS.
3.
Gridnev S, Prokshits E, Sotnikova O, Zolotukhina I. INFLUENCE OF CREEP CONCRETE ON SPACE STABILITY THIN-WALLED DOME COVERINGS. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2021;1(24):51–6.
4.
Chaulagain H, Rodrigues H, Jara J, Spacone E, Varum H. Seismic response of current RC buildings in Nepal: A comparative analysis of different design/construction. Engineering Structures. 2013;49:284–94.
5.
Raut A, Prasad R. Pushover analysis of G+3 reinforced concrete building with soft storey. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng. 2014;(4):25–9.
6.
TAŞKAYA S. Extraction of Floor Session Area of Building Plots by Length Vector Additional Technique in Different Types of Zoning Building Organizations. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2022;7(2):136–47.
7.
Hareen CHBV, Mohan SC. Evaluation of seismic torsional response of ductile RC buildings with soft first story. Structures. 2021;29:1640–54.
8.
Akhil Ahamad S, Pratap KV. Dynamic analysis of G + 20 multi storied building by using shear walls in various locations for different seismic zones by using Etabs. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;43:1043–8.
9.
Matsuno Y, Yamamoto S. A Framework for Dependability Consensus Building and In-Operation Assurance. J Wirel Mob Networks Ubiquitous Comput Dependable Appl. 2013;(1):118–34.
10.
Tm L, Naik S. Comparative study of zone II and zone III for equivalent static method, response spectrum method, and time history method of analysis for single multi-storey building. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2018;(7):1–5.
11.
Suryawanshi A, Bogar V. Seismic Analysis of Building Resting on Sloping Ground with Soil Structure Interaction. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 2019;2135–49.
12.
Abioghlia H. Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil Walls with Finite Element Method. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2016;(3):70–6.
13.
Standard I. Plain and reinforced concrete-code of practice. 2000;
14.
Council A. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. 1996;
15.
Zhang J, Song X. The AI-assisted Traditional Design Methods for the Construction Sustainability: A Case Study of the Lisu Ethnic Minority Village. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2024;9(2):213–33.
16.
Khali H, Rawat KS, Chatterjee RS. Dynamic association of slope movements in the Uttarakhand Himalaya: a critical review on the landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 2023;14(1).
17.
American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers; 2023.
18.
Dutta P, Susilo W, Duong D, Baek J, Roy P. Identity-based Unidirectional Proxy Re-Encryption and Re-Signature in Standard Model: Lattice-based Constructions. J Internet Serv Inf Secur. 2020;(4):1–22.
19.
Council B. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 2000;
20.
Pandey A, Kumar P, Sharma S. Seismic soil-structure interaction of buildings on hill slopes. International Journal of Civil & Structural Engineering. 2011;(2):544–55.
21.
Azaz M, Nikhade A. Pushover Analysis on G+ 10 Reinforced Concrete Structure for zone II and Zone III Ad Per IS. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2002;1893.
22.
Bhavikatti Q, Cholekar S. Soil structure interaction effect for a building resting on sloping ground including infiill subjected to seismic analysis. Qudsia Bhavikatti. 2017;2395–0056.
23.
Rachcha S, Sevalia J. Effect of soil-structure interaction on seismic performance of step back building resting on sloping ground. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2020;(3):1–6.
24.
Singh AK, Kundu J, Sarkar K. Stability analysis of a recurring soil slope failure along NH-5, Himachal Himalaya, India. Natural Hazards. 2017;90(2):863–85.
25.
Council B. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1997;2–12.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
