×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

DRIVING SCM AND HR TRANSFORMATION WITH AI THROUGH THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION AS MEDIATORS

By
Sureshkumar Somanathan Orcid logo ,
Sureshkumar Somanathan

Digital Tranformation Leader, CVS Health United States

R. Harsha Orcid logo ,
R. Harsha

Assistant Professor, Department of MBA, RNS Institute of Technology , Bengaluru , India

Sherzod Khalilov Orcid logo ,
Sherzod Khalilov

Associate professor, Head, Department of Accounting, International School of Finance Technology and Science , Tashkent , Uzbekistan

Anvar Khudoyarov Orcid logo ,
Anvar Khudoyarov

International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan , Tashkent , Uzbekistan

Samariddin Makhmudov Orcid logo ,
Samariddin Makhmudov

Department of Finance and Tourism, Termez University of Economics and Service , Tashkent , Uzbekistan

Pallapati Ravi Kumar Orcid logo ,
Pallapati Ravi Kumar

Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation , Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh , India

Rajinder Kumar Orcid logo
Rajinder Kumar

Associate Professor, Faculty of Computing, Guru Kashi University , Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda , India

Abstract

Due to the fast adoption of digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI), the operations of enterprises, especially in the context of supply chain management (SCM) and human resource (HR) practises, are being fundamentally reorganised by allowing data-driven decision-making, automating processes, and enhancing agility to organisational changes. Although in increased interest AI-driven digital transformation is also gaining momentum, empirical data describing the organisational processes in which AI-driven tools affect SCM and HR performance have scarce information, particularly the intermediating effects of transformational leadership and innovation. To fill this gap, the current research investigates the direct and indirect impacts of digital technologies and AI on changing the SCM and HR practises, and transformational leadership and innovation are modelled as the mediating constructs. The research design was a quantitative and survey research design, and its conceptual framework was empirically proved through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that digital technologies and AI have a powerful positive impact on SCM transformation and HR transformation, whereas transformational leadership and innovation have important mediating roles in enhancing these correlations. The findings provide value to the theory because they expand the digital transformation and leadership views, including technological accounts of AI-driven enterprise systems, and offer practical advice to managers who need to harness the emergent technologies to achieve organisational transformation sustainability. The study was a survey design, consisting of 250 participants. Significant path coefficients were those of the relationship between AI and SCM transformation, where the path coefficient was 0.42 (p < 0.001). The SCM transformation explained variance (R2) was 0.72 and this represents a good fit. The approach was the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) using the SmartPLS software.

References

1.
Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman NV. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation  of insights. MIS quarterly. 2013 Jun 1:471-82.
2.
Bondarouk T, Brewster C. Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research. The International  Journal of Human Resource Management. 2016 Nov 29;27(21):2652-71.
3.
Nohong M, Sylvana A, Sobarsyah M, Herman B. The interaction model of the strategic environment and  business resilience (Empirical study of small medium enterprise in Indonesia). Quality-Access to Success.  2025 May 1;26(206).
4.
Bughin J, Seong J, Manyika J, Chui M, Joshi R. Notes from the AI frontier: Modeling the impact of AI on  the world economy. McKinsey Global Institute. 2018 Sep 4;4(1):2-61.
5.
Nasim K, Sikander A, Tian X. Twenty years of research on total quality management in Higher Education:  A systematic literature review. Higher education quarterly. 2020 Jan;74(1):75-97.
6.
Calatayud A, Mangan J, Christopher M. The self-thinking supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2019 Mar 4;24(1):22-38.
7.
Bennett L, Harris C, Cooper E. A Framework for Implementing Lean Six Sigma in Service-Based  Businesses. National Journal of Quality, Innovation, and Business Excellence. 2024 Sep 16;1(1):16-21.
8.
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based  structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 2015 Jan;43(1):115 35.
9.
Saar A, Tamm R, Lepp J. The Impact of Sustainable Tourism Practices on Hotel Management in Rural Areas.  Journal of Tourism, Culture, and Management Studies. 2024 Sep 16;1(1):20-7.
10.
Ivanov D, Dolgui A. Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles  towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International journal of  production research. 2020 May 18;58(10):2904-15.
11.
Beken K, Caddwine H. Data-Efficient Learning-Assisted Predictive Control for Real-Time Trajectory  Planning Under Dynamic Constraints. Journal of Scalable Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing. 2026  Jan 10:17-23.
12.
Kane GC, Palmer D, Phillips AN, Kiron D, Buckley N. Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan management review. 2015 Jul 14.
13.
Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M. Digital innovation management. MIS quarterly. 2017 Mar  1;41(1):223-38.
14.
Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market  research 2021 Dec 3 (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
15.
Strohmeier S. Digital human resource management: A conceptual clarification. German Journal of Human  Resource Management. 2020 Aug;34(3):345-65.
16.
Tambe P, Cappelli P, Yakubovich V. Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward. California Management Review. 2019;61(4):15–42.
17.
Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong JQ, Fabian N, Haenlein M. Digital  transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research. 2021 Jan  1;122:889-901.
18.
Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital  transformation. 2021 May 26:13-66.
19.
Papadopoulos N, Vasilaki M, Kotsias Y. Operational AI in Business Excellence from Theory to Measurable  Results. National Journal of Quality, Innovation, and Business Excellence. 2025 Mar 20;2(1):44-54.
20.
Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Akter S, Ren SJ, Dubey R, Childe SJ. Big data analytics and firm performance:  Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of business research. 2017 Jan 1;70:356-65.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.